A LEADING candidate for Alex Salmond’s Alba Party is the subject of a second disciplinary tribunal for alleged professional misconduct in her previous job as a lawyer.
Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh, who is Alba’s top-ranked candidate on its Central Scotland list for Holyrood, is due to face a hearing the week after the election.
If Alba gets six per cent of the vote in Central Scotland, she could veery well be an MSP by then.
Ms Ahmed-Sheikh, a former SNP MP, is the subject of an action at the Scottish Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SSDT), prosecuted by the Law Society of Scotland.
The Alba Party’s website refers to Ms Ahmed-Sheikh’s background as a “businesswoman, lawyer and award-winning actress”, but does not mention the tribunal.
Alba said the matter dated back 10 years to Ms Ahmed-Sheikh's previous law firm, Hamilton Burns, which she left in 2015 and which went bust in 2017 owing £638,000.
It is understood the current SSDT case involving Ms Sheikh has been running for more than a year.
The SSDT held a preliminary hearing last August, at which Ms Ahmed-Sheikh’s request to freeze proceedings was rejected.
The SSDT said at the time: "This case is a procedural hearing for complaint of professional misconduct."
READ MORE: Pro-independence supermajority 'within reach' despite Alba set to flop
Ms Ahmed-Sheikh did not take part in the virtual hearing, but was represented by advocate Duncan Hamilton, a former SNP MSP and adviser to Mr Salmond.
Mr Hamilton said a “substantial and detailed” issue was involved.
He said “protection of the public” was an important consideration, but Ms Ahmed-Sheikh was no longer a practising solicitor and did not intend to be one in the foreseeable future.
He said: “There is therefore no risk to the public requiring immediate intervention.”
A further preliminary hearing was due to call on March 17 this year, but the tribunal adjourned it.
A new date of May 11 has now been fixed.
It is listed in the SSDT’s diary as “Virtual Preliminary Hearing: Law Society v Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh”.
The SSDT deals with "complaints about professional misconduct by a solicitor".
It can censure, impose fines of up to £10,000, impose a restriction on a solicitor’s practising certificate, suspend the solicitor for a period, or strike them off the Roll of Solicitors in Scotland.
READ MORE: George Galloway - Regions should decide whether to be part of independent Scotland
Ms Ahmed-Sheikh has already been found guilty of professional misconduct by the SSDT in a previous case.
In 2019, it fined her £3,000 over her handling of a trust fund at the law firm in which she was a partner before entering Westminster.
She and her fellow partner in the now-defunct firm of Hamilton Burns were said to have shown “disregard for the rules”.
The SSDT also found they had failed to keep “properly written up accounting records” and borrowed sums from the fund to support the struggling business, a conflict of interest which risked undermining public confidence in the legal profession.
However the tribunal also accepted they had not been dishonest of benefitted personally.
It agreed their actions had been the result of a mistaken belief that the trust, set up for the benefit of Mr Mickel’s sister in 2012, had been a “private, family matter”, when in legal terms it was considered a client of the firm, and so subject to stricter rules.
Ms Ahmed-Sheikh later challenged the way the expenses had been awarded on a punitive “agent and client basis” by seeking a judicial review at the Court of Session,
READ MORE: Salmond labelled 'Putin apologist' for downplaying Russia's actions
Judge Lord Ericht dismissed her petition as “incompetent” as she had not exhausted other avenues of appeal, and noted that although agent and client expenses were not typical for a court, they were standard for the SSDT.
Ms Ahmed-Sheikh, 50, was a partner in Hamilton Burns until she resigned in May 2015 to take up her place at Westminster as the MP for Ochil and South Perthshire.
Like Mr Salmond, she lost her seat in 2017, and went into business with the former First Minister, producing and co-presenting his show on a Kremlin-backed TV channel.
An Alba spokesperson said: "There is no comment allowed on a Law Society Tribunal hearing which is scheduled but has not taken place.
"These are historic matters dating back 10 years to the former Hamilton Burns legal firm which Tasmina left in 2015 when she was elected to Parliament.
"Alba has full confidence in Tasmina."
The Law Society of Scotland declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel