Research reveals that attractiveness is not universally perceived and it is in fact our culture and individual preferences that shape what we think is attractive.
A new study, led by researchers at the University of Glasgow’s Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, modelled individual preferences for attractive faces in two cultures, Western European and East Asian.
The researchers found, contrary to current assumptions that there is a perceived universal facial beauty, that different cultures and individual preferences defined what is considered to be attractive in both cultural groups.
Facial attractiveness confers considerable advantages in social interactions, with preferences likely reflecting psychobiological mechanisms shaped by natural selection.
Professor Philippe Schyns, author of the study, said: “Here, we demonstrate that Western Europeans and East Asians evaluate facial beauty using culture-specific features, contradicting theories of universality. The results show the diversity of beauty preferences within and across cultures.
“Our results have direct theoretical and methodological impact for representing diversity in social perception, and for the design of culturally and ethnically sensitive socially interactive digital agents.”
In order to measure and understand perceived facial attractiveness, researchers used computers to generate a broad range of young female faces with naturally varying shapes and complexions, and from a mix of ethnicities.
They then asked two matched groups of young male participants, one group of 40 Western European males and another group of 40 East Asian males, to evaluate each face on attractiveness.
READ MORE: The power fashion can have on your productivity
Using the participants’ answers, the researchers were then able to model the facial features that drive perceptions of attractiveness in individuals, and further what features generally drive attractiveness within each cultural group.
The findings refute theories of universal beauty, which suggest attractiveness tends towards an average face, and instead show that Western and Eastern cultures, along with individual preferences, drive which faces people perceive to be attractive.
Moreover, the researchers also showed that the perceived attractive features from one culture are then used by members of that culture to judge other-ethnicity faces on their attractiveness.
The paper ‘Modelling individual preferences reveals that face beauty is not universally perceived across cultures’ is published in Current Biology.
The work is funded by Wellcome Trust and the Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here