NHS patients are being put at risk of “avoidable harm”and may be missing vital cancer screening tests because sex and gender are not recorded separately, a study warns.
The NHS number, a lifelong identifier given at birth, codes people by biological sex with odd numbers for male and even numbers for female.
This drives sex specific automated screening invitations for diseases such as cervical or breast cancer and other which primarily affect men including aortic aneurysm.
Many trans or non-binary people opt to change their NHS number and no medical intervention is required to do this.
Research involving the University of St Andrews found that this effectively renders the NHS number a marker of gender instead of sex and risks patients missing health services that are determined by biological sex.
READ MORE: Cherry tells voters it is not 'transphobic' to advocate for women's rights
The Royal College of General Practitioners already recommends that sex and gender are recorded separately in medical records and the study calls for this to be replicated across the NHS.
The World Health Organisation defines gender as the “characteristics of women and men that are socially constructed” while sex refers to those that are “biologically determined” such as the gametes, chromosomes, hormones and reproductive organs.
The study, which also involved the universities of Cambridge and Dundee found that contemporary medical research and clinical practice “often erroneously use sex and gender interchangeably” which it said was leading to “avoidable harm”.
It points to a recent report which concluded that sex and gender are both powerful risk factors for virtually every disease and affect every organ.
Differences in drug metabolism are increasingly well recognised,while gender can significantly affect how individuals experience healthcare and engage with treatment.
READ MORE: Equality campaigners to give evidence in landmark gender court case
The study concludes that “untangling” the difference between sex and gender is crucial for safe, dignified,and effective healthcare of all groups.
Margaret McCarthy, one of the study authors, said: “The NHS asks whether you are male or female.
“However this can be changed on request, so the opposite is put on the records.
"No medical intervention is needed in order to change the sex marker on NHS records.
“The NHS will then use that changed marker for screening, lab tests, etc.
“The NHS, in my view, needs to record sex - because that drives so much medical care, and not just gender, which it has then become.”
Researchers said missing data on patients on sex and gender had meant that there was no accurate data on whether gender-diverse people were more or less affected by Covid-19 or whether public health advice around the virus should be different for trans people who are taking cross-sex hormones.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon strongly condemns accusations of transphobia in party
Nicola Sturgeon has said that trans people are “some of the most prejudiced against, discriminated against and stigmatised groups” in the country.
The SNP has plans to reform the gender recognition law proposing a change to allow transgender people to self-declare their gender identity rather than needing a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
The policy reform has been met with a number of concerns from various sectors of society including the SNP’s Women’s Pledge group, which has said it puts women’s sex-based rights at risk.
The 2021 census in England and Wales will now following a legal challenge ask individuals their sex according to their birth or gender recognition certificate, followed by questions on gender identify.
In Scotland, the national statistician is currently consulting on the wording on sex and gender for next year’s census.
The paper ‘Sex, gender and medical data’ is published in the BMJ .
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel