ALEX Salmond has criticised the SNP’s independence strategy – warning that “pigeon-holing yourself into one route and one timescale” plays into the hands of Boris Johnson.
The former first minister was speaking to journalists and bloggers after his Alba Party announced its candidates to contest the list ballot at May’s Holyrood election in a bid to produce a “supermajority” in favour of independence.
Mr Salmond was asked his view on when a second referendum should take place if the Scottish Parliament does return a majority of MSPs in favour of independence.
The current make-up of Holyrood is a pro-independence majority, made up by SNP and Scottish Greens MSPs.
At Tuesday's election leaders' debate, Nicola Sturgeon said a referendum should be held in the first half of the next parliamentary term, dependent on the Covid-19 pandemic being resolved.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond demands Alba Party included in live election debates
Mr Salmond said that the Alba Party’s position is that “the Scottish Parliament should be consulted and should give a direction to the Scottish Government to begin independence negotiations with the UK Government”.
He added that “as part of these independence negotiations” between Holyrood and Westminster, “the UK Government might wish to put down stipulations” for a referendum to be held or a consultation to take place in order to “assure themselves that independence is the decided wish of the Scottish people".
The former first minister appears to be at odds with the SNP’s strategy to force the Prime Minister to agree to a second referendum.
The SNP believes a majority in May’s election will give them a mandate for an independence vote and if Mr Johnson continues to ignore their pleas for a re-run of the 2014 poll, the party will legislate for Holyrood to hold its own referendum which is likely to lead to a legal battle.
But Mr Salmond said: “I don’t think you should tell, in advance, your negotiating opponent, what exactly you’re going to do and the timescale you intend to do it on.
READ MORE: Sturgeon: Alex Salmond is gambling with Holyrood's system
“I think you should begin negotiations and these negotiations have an infinitely higher chance of succeeding if the First Minister has a substantial independence majority in the Parliament than they would have if she’s in a precarious parliamentary position with regard to independence.
“Pigeon-holing yourself into one route and one timescale I think has limitations over the advantages of taking the substantial independence supermajority in the parliament and taking direction in that and including the parliament instead of a single party in the drive to independence in Scotland.”
Mr Salmond rubbished accusations his party is “gaming” the Holyrood electoral system by attempting to create a “supermajority” of indy-backing MSPs, despite not necessarily being the will of the public.
He said: “I don’t really understand the argument about gaming the system as it’s called.
“Everybody has an equal opportunity to stand for election under this system.”
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar: Alex Salmond Alba Party comeback driven by 'revenge'
Mr Salmond added: “I think most people would say it’s more democratic, more participative, more inclusive than say a first past the post system where Boris Johnson can become a Tory Prime Minister on 40% of the vote with a 100 majority. Is he gaming that system? He probably is.
“That’s no different form the Green party, which only stands in a handful of constituency seats around Scotland. The difference is that we argue our commitment to Scottish independence is absolute, people know that and people who wish to see Scottish independence and the Scottish supermajority will vote Alba in the regional list.”
Mr Salmond said “there’s a range of measures that could be taken” if the Prime Minister is “foolish enough to try and deny the sovereign rights of the Scottish people” by refusing a second referendum to take place.
He said one option would be “a plebiscite organised by the parliaments”, as well as exploring legal action.
Mr Salmond added: “You would mobilise popular opinion in Scotland including peaceful demonstrations which is an entirely legitimate part of politics.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel