THE joy of hotels, forgotten art of socialising and new narratives were the topics raised by columnists in the newspapers.
The Daily Express
Virginia Blackburn said there is one particular pleasure we have been denied over the past year - that of hotels.
“There is something about staying in one that nothing else can match,” she said. “It’s the sense that you could be anyone in a hotel, they still can’t be totally sure you are who you say you are.”
She said some hotels such as the Gritti Palace in Venice are destinations in their own right.
“The actor Richard Harris lived in one of the most glamorous hotels in the world,” she added. “The Savoy in London, and it was there that he, too, began his last journey and had to be taken out through the foyer on a stretcher. Fellow guests goggled and Harris managed one last carouse. He hoisted himself up. “It’s the food!” he cried.
The Guardian
Eleanor Margolis said as lockdown eases, the idea of having to hold a conversation with someone other than her partner or the select few people I regularly video call, fills her with both excitement and dread.
“Even before my year without a social life, I was prone to social anxiety,” she said. “Now, I feel like I need to take a nap after exchanging small talk with a delivery person.
“To varying degrees, we’ve all forgotten how to exist in a world where it’s OK to kiss our relatives, or rub the corner of your eye without first washing your hands for the duration of the birthday song.”
The Independent
Tom Peck said Boris Johnson needs to ‘hurry along’ the public inquiry into the handling of coronavirus.
“Now is the perfect time for a new narrative, for new angles to focus on,” he said. “Maybe then, just maybe, “there is a new story,” as Tony Sewell might say, about the Barnard Castle experience. About how it was an opportunity for one man to transform himself through the power of gazing at some bluebells, not to mention remodelling himself as a more courageous motorist.
“There are, if you’re just prepared to open your mind a bit, new narratives everywhere. New stories to tell.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here