By Beatrice Fihn and Dr Michael Orgel
THAT nuclear weapons are now illegal may well have passed some Scots by. After all, mainstream media didn’t exactly make a fuss about it. Yet there has been opposition to the nuclear weapons based in the Clyde for the half a century or so they have menacingly been situated there. "Ordinary" Scots, civil society, the STUC, Scotland’s churches, the Scottish Parliament and many of Scotland’s MPs have spoken out, demonstrated and campaigned against them both because of the existential risks they represent and the conviction that the funds invested in them could be better used to build back better and fairer from the pandemic.
And then in January, the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons went into legal effect. The treaty makes it clear that no activities assisting the development and maintenance of nuclear weapons are permitted.
So what now? Those weapons are not only still sitting in the Clyde, but the Westminster Government is determined to renew them. Its recent decision to increase the UK’s number of nuclear weapons by up to 40% is a dangerous and provocative move.
The Scots who have taken a stand against nuclear weapons may not be aware how their personal savings and pension contributions are contributing to Trident renewal, and to other nuclear weapons programmes. It is our money – our savings, our pension funds – that finance the companies making nuclear weapons that threaten our planet. The 19 million NatWest, Royal Bank of Scotland and Ulster Bank customers probably don’t know that the group lent £1.6 billion to 11 companies involved in the French, British and American nuclear arsenals.
From NatWest’s recently-released annual report it is clear that the outstanding loans to these 11 companies are just a drop in the ocean and terminating them now is not likely to make a significant difference to NatWest’s bottom line. Now there’s a chance for change.
NatWest Group is updating its investment policies. That’s why the Church of Scotland, numerous Scottish trade union councils and dozens of other civil society organisations joined a call to NatWest Group to make sure no companies involved in any nuclear weapon programmes can borrow money.
Other big financial institutions, like KBC Group, already recognise that nuclear weapons are illegal under international law and issued statements showing they are in compliance with the new treaty. NatWest has the chance to change its policy and reflect the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons makes nuclear weapons illegal under international law.
The group has committed to “work responsibly” with clients and customers “to encourage sustainable practices and enable economic activities that create shared prosperity for current and future generations”.
Prosperity is not bought by nuclear bombs, nor by spending our money on weapons that are outlawed. NatWest has the chance to take concrete steps toward joining the Scottish people in building a responsible and sustainable future with investments in products and communities that build up our world, and avoiding weapons that risk ending it.
Beatrice Fihn is Executive Director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons; Dr Michael Orgel is a member of Medact Scotland
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel