Fears raised in the EU that the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine could cause blood clots had no impact on the UK public’s intention to get the jab.
Several European countries including France, Germany and Italy suspended use of the vaccine last week, although they later said they would resume its rollout after the European Medicines Agency regulator concluded it is “safe and effective”.
University of Stirling researchers were collecting data for a wider project on fear and concerns relating to Covid-19, and examined whether negative news reports over the EU AstraZeneca jab 'pause' resulted in “vaccine hesitancy”.
READ MORE: AstraZeneca vaccine '100 per cent effective against severe coronavirus'
Comparing data from March 12-15, before the story reached its peak, with that from March 17, the day after the story broke in full, they found no drop in intentions or attitudes towards getting the jab - and the public's appetitte to get vaccinated
On Monday March 15, researchers found 83.3 per cent of respondents said they intended to receive the vaccine. On March 17, the figure was 86.1%.
Dr David Comerford, of the university’s Behavioural Science Centre, said: “Our data provided time-lapse footage of the public’s response to the story.
“We found no effect of the press stories on intentions to take the vaccine or on intentions to refuse it. Furthermore, there was no change to the perceived costs and benefits of being vaccinated.
“This is not to say that the UK public were not concerned by the news. Google Trends data shows increasing search activity for the terms ‘vaccine’ and ‘safe’ as the AstraZeneca suspension story was unfolding, but that concern did not translate into mistrust of the vaccination programme in the UK.
“In fact, a record number of people took the vaccine on the following Saturday, March 20.”
Researchers looked at Google searches including the words “vaccine” and “safe” between February 21 and March 21 and found there was a “clear uptick in search activity coincident with the events and media reporting”, with search activity peaking on Monday March 15 and remaining high on March 16.
The report stated: “These data demonstrate that the blood clot/AZ suspension story entered the public consciousness and caused sufficient concern to prompt the UK public to seek information online.”
The study has been published as a pre-print on Research Square and is currently undergoing peer review.
Data was collected from 546 people, with 241 responding between March 12-15 and 305 on March 17.
Researchers said the results suggest public confidence in the vaccination programme remains strong within the UK, but there is emerging evidence that confidence among European residents was damaged by these events.
READ MORE: Vaccines row - Can the EU actually introduce an export ban?
The European Medicines Agency concluded there is no overall increase in the risk of blood clots with the vaccine, and in fact it is likely to reduce the overall risk of clots.
The regulator said its benefits in preventing Covid-19 hospital admission and death greatly outweigh potential risks.
Dr Comerford said: “An important question for future research is why the UK and European public responded differently and whether there are any lessons that can be learned to manage future scare stories.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel