WITH the first anniversary of lockdown marked yesterday, the past year dominated the comment sections of the newspapers.
The Daily Express
Vanessa Feltz said we had used the word unprecedented, unprecedented times over the past 12 months.
“We said we’d reassess our priorities,” she said. “We promised to phone all the people we remembered to love and speak to them voice to voice. We discovered Zoom. Our wardrobes shrunk. Life shrunk.”
She said working from home was both hellish and magical.
“ Serene squirrel-watchers squirrelled away cash,” she added. “Frazzled home-schoolers juggled full-time jobs, babes in arms and algebra. Garden owners channelled Monty Don and cultivated carrots.
“Singletons wished for partners. Empty nesters rejoiced as adult fledglings flew home. Spouses fell out, reconciled and often decided to “lump” it if we didn’t like it.
“Most of us survived. None of us will ever be the same again. March 23, 2021. Happy anniversary.”
The Guardian
Toby Ord, senior research fellow in philosophy at Oxford University, said the pandemic had shattered our illusions of safety and reminded us that despite all the progress made in science and technology, we remain vulnerable to catastrophes that can overturn our entire way of life.
“Technological progress since the Industrial Revolution has ultimately increased the risk of the most extreme events, putting humanity’s future at stake through nuclear war or climate breakdown,” he said. “The UK should launch a new national centre for biosecurity, as has been recommended by the joint committee on the National Security Strategy and my own institute at Oxford University.”
He said there are concrete steps the UK can take to transform its resilience to threats and there is no better time than now.
“ Covid-19 has given us the chance to make decades’ worth of progress in a matter of months. We must seize this opportunity.”
The Independent
Julia Bell has spent much of the past year in her garden shed, she said.
“My hair thinned, I slept badly, I stockpiled, started gardening furiously, growing vegetables again for the first time in years,” she said. “I felt bad for anyone without access to outside space. We were OK in our bubble but underpinned by nagging anxiety. How much worse was this going to get?”
She said as the year wore on, we all gradually knew of people who had Covid.
“Now, it’s spring again and I’m back in the shed, I feel lucky to have it, and grateful to past me for bothering to build it,2 she said. “I can feel things easing up a little, as I could feel them closing down a year ago. At least now we have a better sense of what we’re facing, and the kids are back at school.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here