Researchers have found that there are substantial differences in who was asked to shield from coronavirus depending on where they live in the UK.
This new collaboration of researchers called the Health Foundation’s Networked Data Lab (NDL), features scientists from both the University of Aberdeen and NHS Grampian.
Differences in age, methods of identifying those at risk, and the proportion of shielding people who live in deprived areas were the main findings from the first wave of data to come out of the project.
This the researchers suggest, means that a one-size-fits-all care plan to support these vulnerable people will not be effective and highlights the need for tailored guidance and support.
READ MORE: Covid Scotland: monitoring must continue for foreseeable future
Research Fellow at the University and Analytical Lead for the project in Grampian, Dr Jessica Butler, said: “The shielding plan was made to protect those at very high risk of serious health problems if they contracted Covid-19.
"However, shielding could also have far-reaching negative consequences.
“Shielding could result in people not receiving usual healthcare for their underlying conditions so isolation now may result in worse outcomes and heavier use of healthcare later which means there is an urgent need to understand and plan for the healthcare needs of those shielding.
“It is our view that careful monitoring and early intervention are key to lowering risk.”
The first project for the team has been to study those who were told to shield from coronavirus because they were identified as vulnerable to severe illness if they were to be infected.
In March 2020, the NHS identified people who, due to underlying health conditions, could be at especially high risk from Covid-19.
These people were then directed to stay at home and minimise contact with people outside their household with the aim being to reduce the risk of infection and the severe health consequences of Covid-19.
In their analysis of the shielding population, the team found that there were differences in how many people were asked to shield according to where they lived.
READ MORE: Covid Scotland: Aberdeen University testing facility open to all
Grampian had the lowest proportion of the population asked to shield with only 2.5%, compared to 4.2% in Wales, 5.1% in North West London, 5.3% in Leeds and 7.5% in Liverpool and Wirral.
There were also differences in how shielders were identified, for example, in Wales the majority of people asked to shield were identified by automated scan of their medical records, while in Grampian many people were asked because their GP or hospital consultant believed they were vulnerable to Covid-19.
The team also found that those asked to shield were a very diverse group of people, both in terms of their personal characteristics and in their underlying medical conditions.
Those asked to shield in Grampian were much older than the population average, and more likely to live in an area that the Scottish Government classifies as deprived.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Scotland has highest virus rate in UK amid concerns over spike in cases among young adults
However, in total in Grampian, only 8% of the clinically extremely vulnerable population live in the most deprived areas, compared with 60% of people shielding in Liverpool and Wirral.
In Grampian the main reason people were asked to shield was having an underlying respiratory illness like severe asthma, followed by use of immunosuppressants and cancer.
Dr Butler explained further: “We found substantial variation across the UK in how shielders were identified as well as in their personal circumstances - including the types of illnesses they have, where they live whether that’s in towns and cities or rurally, neighbourhood deprivation, and ethnicity, all of which highlights the different types of support that will be needed to ensure this diverse group can stay safe.
“Most importantly, sharing and understanding the range of local approaches used to identify the most vulnerable and support them helps to ensure that all who are at risk are identified and given equitable access to the services they need.
“This is particularly important now, as many have been asked to shield again and the vaccination programme begins to reach these groups.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here