IN contrast to the reliably leaky Holyrood inquiry into the Alex Salmond affair, James Hamilton maintained a strict radio silence throughout his investigation.
As well he might, given the military-grade damage he could have inflicted on the First Minister’s career, and by extension the independence movement.
The MSP-led inquiry into the Salmond affair was always going to be politically-slanted.
Indeed, many of its members hoped to prolong it as long as possible so that it bled into the Holyrood election campaign.
To their surprise, Government obstruction and Covid ended up doing it for them. But few believed their work would ultimately pose a grave risk to Nicola Sturgeon.
The truly serious threat was always seen as coming from Mr Hamilton, the inscrutable outsider with no political axe to grind.
The first clue that he had cleared Ms Sturgeon came early yesterday when the SNP told its election candidates to expect a group call with Ms Sturgeon on Thursday.
That was hardly the sign of a party preparing to change leader after an ethics scandal.
So Mr Hamilton's not guilty verdict, revealed a few hours later, was not a complete surprise.
Ms Sturgeon's opponents hope today's publication of the MSP inquiry will keep the 'SNP sleaze' mantra going a bit longer.
READ MORE: Holyrood’s inquiry into unlawful Salmond investigation to publish findings
It may well see the accelerated retirement of the Government's top official, Permanent Secretary Leslie Evans, for her failings.
But the bottom line is that Ms Sturgeon has been cleared.
Mr Hamilton found no breach of the Scottish Ministerial Code, and the First Minister will breeze past the Tories' vote of no confidence.
When Holyrood breaks for the election tomorrow, the SNP will give a collective sigh of relief. But there are also troubles ahead.
Mr Hamilton failed to exorcise the claim that has haunted Ms Sturgeon for two years - that she lied to MSPs about her actions.
Ms Hamilton pointedly said it was for the parliament to decide whether it had been misled.
In addition, he suggested one of Ms Sturgeon's officials breached the confidentiality of the Government's sexual misconduct process by naming a woman who had complained about Mr Salmond to his former chief of staff, Geoff Aberdein.
Mr Hamilton said that because four other witnesses corroborated Mr Aberdein's version of events: "I believe that Mr Aberdein's account of what was said by [the official about] the existence of the complaints and the identity of the complainers is credible".
The opposition have already said such a breach would be a dismissal offence, and are likely to demand Ms Sturgeon sacks the person.
Finally, Mr Salmond has yet to speak. He is a wounded beast who knows how to wound others.
The election isn't in the bag yet.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel