Division within the SNP could be impacting on support for Scottish independence, a new report has claimed.
Scotland’s governing party has been hit by internal disputes, with former first minister Alex Salmond claiming leading figures in the SNP had been involved in a conspiracy against him.
Meanwhile, his successor Nicola Sturgeon is facing a vote of no confidence in the Scottish Parliament, with opposition leaders claiming she misled Parliament with regard to what she told MSPs about her knowledge of harassment allegations made against Mr Salmond.
Ms Sturgeon was grilled by MSPs for eight hours as a Holyrood committee investigates the Scottish Government’s botched handling of complaints against the former first minister.
The think tank Onward commissioned two polls on support for Scottish independence – with these taking place just before and after the First Minister’s committee appearance.
The First Minister gave evidence for eight hours
In the first of these, 56% said they would vote Yes in a second referendum, with 44% favouring staying in the UK.
But the second poll, carried out a week later put support for independence at 53%, with 47% opposed.
The think tank said that while support for independence was “at historical highs” it was also “extremely volatile”.
READ MORE: SNP set for knife-edge majority in Holyrood vote
Its new State of the Union report said: “In our second wave poll, conducted a week later, the Yes lead fell by five percentage points driven in large part by a nine-point swing among women and a 25-point swing among 18 to 24-year-olds towards No.
“This was the week that Nicola Sturgeon gave evidence to the Scottish Parliament inquiry into the Salmond trial, suggesting that division within the independence movement is affecting vote intention.”
With the SNP using May’s Holyrood elections to push for a second referendum, Onward said its poll had found almost half (49%) of all Scots wanted coronavirus to be “completely eliminated in Scotland” before such a vote is held.
This including 48% of Yes voters, according to the think tank, which stated: “It is clear that, however much they may support independence in principle, Scottish voters want politicians to focus on the immediate crisis of the pandemic, rather than independence.”
It went on to say that 43% of people – including 40% of Yes voters – wanted jobs and economic growth in Scotland to be “back to where they were before coronavirus” as another condition of having a second referendum.
The report said: “This suggests that voters see the economic consequences of the pandemic as nearly as important as the public health impact in deciding the timing of any referendum.”
Splits in the SNP have 'sowed doubts' in voters minds
Will Tanner, report-co-author and director of Onward, said: “The breakup of the United Kingdom is not a foregone conclusion. Headline support for Scottish independence may be worryingly high, but it is clear that Scots do not want a referendum until coronavirus has been eliminated and the economy recovered.
“In addition, the Alex Salmond trial appears to be sowing doubt in voters’ minds at exactly the moment the vaccine programme is proving the benefits of partnership within the Union.”
Speaking as the Scottish Government published a draft independence referendum Bill on Monday Constitution Secretary Mike Russell insisted that ministers had been “laser-focused over the past year on tackling the pandemic”.
But he stated: “The question we face as we come out of the health crisis is this: who has the right to decide the kind of country Scotland should be after the pandemic?
“Should it be the people who live here, or Westminster Governments?”
READ MORE: IndyRef2 debate 'distracting from more pressing Scottish issues', Labour MP claims
And SNP depute leader Keith Brown said: “When the current Covid crisis is over the people of Scotland – not Boris Johnson – have the right to decide how we recover from the pandemic.
“The SNP is fully-focussed on tackling Covid-19, but the powers that come with independence are essential if we are to create the kind of country we know is possible after the pandemic.
“Boris Johnson and the Tories have ridden roughshod over Scotland by hammering our economy with a hard Brexit, stripping powers from the Scottish Parliament, and threatening to sign away our NHS in a damaging trade deal. We can’t let the Tories wreck Scotland’s recovery.”
Mr Brown insisted: “The people of Scotland must have the right to choose a better future in a post-pandemic referendum. Giving both votes to the SNP in May is the only way to protect that right and put Scotland’s future in Scotland’s hands.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel