Fewer than one in ten people who are working from home want to go back to the office full-time when coronavirus restrictions lift.
A new study found that only 9 per cent of those currently working from home want to be in the office four or five days a week.
Nearly eight out of 10 (78%) said they would prefer to be in the office two days a week or less, according to a new study.
And almost a third (31%) said they did not want to spend any time in the office – saying their preference would be to have zero days there.
However, preliminary analysis of the study, which was carried out by academics at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow and the University of Manchester, also found significant numbers said their health had worsened after working from home.
READ MORE: Mark Smith — We must fight to save office life.
Two fifths (40%) believe their mental health has worsened, while 37% reported their physical health was not as good.
According to the report, 45% report increased mental fatigue and 40% increased stress since working from home, while 42% report more stiff shoulders, 41% stiff necks, 24% more numbness in arms, wrists or hands.
The study was carried out by the universities and the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC), with the support of trade unions including Unite, Unison, the Public and Commercial Services union (PCS) and the Communication Workers Union (CWU).
A total of 3,140 workers across the UK gave details of their experiences of working from home following the coronavirus pandemic – with the results published almost a year on from the initial lockdown.
In late 2019, just 5% of the UK workforce was home-based, but in April 2020, after the pandemic hit, 43.1% of workers were working from home.
While this number declined to 25% in August last year, it rose again to more than 40% in early 2021, as countries across the UK again imposed tough restrictions to help prevent the spread of the virus.
Almost a third of workers (32%) taking part in the survey said they experienced a large increase in volumes of work, with 38% also reporting increased intensity and 32% greater pressure.
Meanwhile, about 30% said it was more difficult to meet targets while working from home, and want these to be relaxed.
Missing out on social interaction was the most common reason to want to return to the workplace, with this cited by 83% of people, with 45% also saying they would prefer their home life and their work life to be separate, while 29% said their workstation at home was inappropriate.
When asked why they wanted to continue working from home, 86% said they liked not having to travel to work, with 71% saying they had more flexibility, while 69% believe they are safer, with 63% saying they can meet targets just as easily while doing their job from home.
READ MORE: The difficult truths about working from home
Professor Phil Taylor from Strathclyde University, one of the report’s authors, warned employers against adopting a blanket approach in the future.
He said: “There is a majority preference from workers of wanting to spend two days or less in the workplace. However, a blanket approach is inappropriate.
“There is also compelling evidence that WFH is not desirable for a significant minority. The reasons are many and complex, but include inadequate domestic workstation arrangements, space constraints, compromised work-life balance, gendered experiences of domestic and household burdens and loneliness and isolation.”
STUC general secretary, Roz Foyer, said: “This work reflects what we have been hearing from unions across Scotland. The experiences of working from home and attitudes toward future home working are very varied.
“Significant numbers of workers have experienced work intensification and stress over the past year, yet for many others the overall experience has been positive.”
She added: “A key conclusion is that many workers are positive about some degree of future home working, but this must be optional, flexible and only undertaken through negotiation.
“Millions of workers were not initially employed to work from home and have a right to resist imposed changes. There has never been a more important time for these workers to join a union.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here