Line of Duty
BBC1/iPlayer
****
DEAD of night. A phone rings at the Murder Investigations Team HQ, the news important enough to tear the boss away from the telly.
“We’ve just had a call from a CHIS* handler submitting information relevant to Vella,” barks the officer to his chief. “Intel has graded the info 1A on the Matrix.”
Eh? What is a CHIS? Who or what is Vella? 1A on the Matrix? What’s Keanu Reeves got to do with this?
And the soundtrack is getting louder, and the drums are beating like a heart about to burst, and now there’s a convoy of four vehicles going too fast down a street, and my mouth is dry and my armpits wet, and OMG I CAN’T COPE!
Yes, Jed Mercurio’s attempt to confound the claims of deodorant manufacturers continues with the sixth series of Line of Duty, which started last night at regulation breakneck pace. This lot make The Sweeney look like the Still Game mob.
READ MORE: Ten reasons we love hit drama
Everything has changed since the trio of Detective Superintendent Ted Hastings, DS Steve Arnott and DI Kate Fleming (Adrian Dunbar, Martin Compston, Vicky McClure) ended the last series with a dirty great cloud hanging over AC-12, the force's anti-corruption unit.
Yet at the same time nothing has changed. Ted continues to coin catchphrases (including one surely borrowed from Scotland, “Haud yer wheesht!”); Steve is still half man, half waistcoat; and Kate remains the smartest cookie in the biscuit tin, even if she does wear jumpers that look like knitted porridge.
Ah, but who is this woman striding confidently round the place, her Scots voice soft as a Spring lamb’s fleece but her determination made from girders? It’s DCI Joanne Davidson (Kelly Macdonald, her aff Trainspotting), the latest enigmatic officer who may, or may not, be linked to the network of bent coppers that AC-12 have been hunting from day one.
Davidson seemed like a sort you would trust. But then there was that business of spotting something iffy on the way to a raid. Was it sheer chance, or a carefully laid plan to let the suspect scarper? “That convoy was going like the clappers,” said Ted. “You’d do well to spot a pipe band in there.” Oh Ted, we’ve missed you.
Already, Mercurio is messing with our minds, and the distraction could hardly be more welcome.
Never mind Covid-19 and all those other jumbles of letters and numbers of the past year. Ted, Steve and Kate are back and the only thing they want to catch is the key to his whole mystery – H, the spider at the centre of the web.
Line of Duty has been a smash for lots of reasons. The tight as a tourniquet plotting. The sensational twists. The slick editing. But at its heart are the three main characters, the little family against the machine. Mercurio teased out more of their back stories. Steve is not a happy bunny, still necking the painkillers like sweeties; ditto Ted and Kate, each for their own reasons we cannot wait to learn more about.
READ MORE: kelly Macdonald and Martin Compston interviewed
Yet we will wait. A whole week between each episode. Mercurio wants his police procedural screened old school, rather than every episode being made available at once on iPlayer. It is like being back in the 1970s with appointment to view TV, but without the stomach turning sexism.
As ever with Mercurio, women are front and centre of the action. Macdonald brings the star power previously exercised by Keeley Hawes and Thandie Newton. She is a tougher character to read than any of her predecessors. Could she be "H"?
By the end of episode one, millions will have been rushing to Google to decipher the clues. DCI Davidson was as troubled as any viewer. “Something doesn’t add up,” she said. You bet it doesn’t, but we live in hope that it will at some point. Just not yet.
*CHIS: a Covert Human Intelligence Source.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel