NEARLY all officers of a local Scottish Labour party have resigned in protest at the removal of a Holyrood candidate who spoke out on indyref2.
Eleven officers at Glasgow Kelvin Constituency Labour Party (CLP) – including the chair, vice-chairs and secretary – announced the move after Hollie Cameron was dropped earlier this month.
She was deselected after an interview with our sister paper The Sunday National in which she said Labour “respects the right” to have a referendum, with the “only quibble” in the party over the timing of it.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour remove Holyrood candidate after Indyref2 comments
Party bosses insisted she had failed to give assurances she would follow the party whip, but the decision sparked anger among members and a petition was launched calling for her reinstatement.
Equality and human rights activist Pam Duncan-Glancy has been selected as Cameron’s replacement.
A statement issued yesterday by 11 Glasgow Kelvin CLP members – believed to represent all but two officers – said: “In light of the decision by Scottish Labour’s SEC to impose a candidate on Glasgow Kelvin CLP for the Holyrood elections in May, displacing the democratically selected candidate Hollie Cameron, the following officers of Glasgow Kelvin CLP have decided to resign their offices immediately.
“We are resigning because we believe the reasons offered for removing Hollie are unjust and contradictory. Further, the CLP and the executive have been entirely side-lined.
“Hollie’s treatment in this process has been unacceptable and we fear will deter future candidates putting themselvesforward.
“We cannot commit to campaigning in this constituency when our democratically selected candidate has been removed, but we want to stress that we wish to see all Labour candidates succeed throughout Glasgow and across Scotland.”
The signatories include chair Pauline Bryan, vice-chairs Diarmaid Kelliher and Kim Bonnar, and secretary Vince Mills, along with seven other key officers.
Responding to the resignations, a Scottish Labour spokesperson said: “We will be running a positive campaign in Glasgow Kelvin which focuses on what unites us, not what divides us, and prioritises a national recovery plan for a fairer and stronger Scotland.”
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has argued that another referendum is not credible at this time.
The move to block Cameron was condemned by the SNP candidate for Glasgow Kelvin, Kaukab Stewart, who said: “Anas Sarwar has failed his first test of leadership by making it abundantly clear that any Labour supporters who believe that the people of Scotland have a democratic right to choose their own future are not welcome in his party.”
Scottish Labour regional MSP for Lothian Neil Findlay also criticised the decision as “absolutely outrageous”.
He tweeted: “Hollie Cameron was selected by members of her constituency, her views chime with many Labour voters and with the views expressed my [sic] myself, Monica Lennon and many members.”
It comes as a new collection of essays published today by left-wing group Open Labour and the Politics for the Many campaign argues Labour “should not shy away” from the independence debate.
READ MORE: Scottish independence: Boris Johnson doubles down on 'once in a generation' referendum claim
Declan McLean, a Scottish Labour activist, wrote: “That means we should not deny Scots the opportunity to discuss independence if it is the desire of the majority.
“We may disagree on the timing, but we should not be seen to be standing in opposition to democratic wishes.
“While we might hope and expect that under a new, federal relationship, most Scots would vote to remain within the UK, we should also be prepared to address the feelings of many that this issue is unending.
“We could do this by approving the Welsh Government’s ‘voluntary association’ stance and providing the Scotland Act with a provision which allows the Scottish Parliament to hold a referendum, which could then be caveated by the inclusion of a time bar that would prevent a referendum from being held more frequently than is desirable, or in contrast to a majority’s opinion against one.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel