THE Alex Salmond inquiry has reportedly concluded it is "hard to believe" Nicola Sturgeon did not know of concerns about the former first minister's behaviour before November 2017, as she has claimed.
In a further leak about the findings of the inquiry into Scottish Government's unlawful investigation of Mr Salmond, a majority of MSPs are understood to have concluded that Ms Sturgeon misled the Holyrood committee if she did have knowledge of the concerns.
Ms Sturgeon has claimed she was informed about a media inquiry relating to the then-First Minister's alleged behaviour towards female Edinburgh Airport staff in November 2017 and that was the first she had ever heard of his potential inappropriate behaviour.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon ‘not surprised’ by ‘partisan leak’ from Alex Salmond inquiry
Sky News has reported that the committee believes Ms Sturgeon should have acted upon any information about her predecessor's conduct.
It also revealed the Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints is "concerned" about the meetings Ms Sturgeon had with Mr Salmond after he revealed he was being investigated, and why it took the First Minister more than two months to tell the head of Scotland's civil service what she knew.
According to Sky News reporter James Matthews, the committee believes: "She should have made the Permanent Secretary aware as soon as possible after the April 2 2018 meeting, at which point she should have confirmed she would cease contact with Alex Salmond."
The latest leak follows the revelation that the committee is understood to have voted by a five to four majority that Ms Sturgeon gave an "inaccurate" account of a meeting with her predecessor, and therefore misled parliament.
Ms Sturgeon has described the news as a "very partisan leak" from the inquiry and said it is "not that surprising" as the committee is understood to have deemed she misled parliament.
On Thursday evening, she told Sky News: "I stand by all of the evidence I gave to the committee, all eight hours' worth of evidence.
"What's been clear is that opposition members of this committee made their minds up about me before I uttered a single word of evidence, their public comments have made that clear.
"So this leak from the committee - very partisan leak - tonight before they've finalised the report is not that surprising."
She added that she is awaiting the result of the James Hamilton QC investigation into whether she broke the ministerial code.
A Scottish Parliament spokeswoman said the committee - which has four SNP members and five from other parties - is still considering its report.
It is expected to be published on Tuesday.
The Holyrood inquiry was set up after a successful judicial review by Mr Salmond resulted in the Scottish Government's investigation being ruled unlawful and "tainted by apparent bias", with a £512,250 payout being awarded to him for legal fees in 2019.
A spokesman for the First Minister said: "The First Minister told the truth to the committee in eight hours of evidence, and stands by that evidence.
"It is clear from past public statements that opposition members of this committee had prejudged the First Minister at the outset of the inquiry and before hearing a word of her evidence, so this partisan and selective briefing - before the committee has actually published its final report - is hardly surprising.
"The question of the First Minister's adherence to the ministerial code is being considered independently by James Hamilton, and we expect to receive and publish his report soon."
Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross has called for Ms Sturgeon's resignation, and said: "The committee will publish its findings in the coming days and we will wait for that report. However, we are really only waiting for confirmation of what we already know.
"We have detailed that the First Minister misled the Scottish Parliament. Nicola Sturgeon has not told the public the truth about what she knew and when.
"We cannot set a precedent that a First Minister of Scotland can mislead the Scottish Parliament and get away with it.
"We have to trust that the First Minister will be truthful. We no longer can."
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon 'misled parliament' over Alex Salmond affair, inquiry finds
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said: "I am not going to prejudge the outcome of the committee report and we await its findings, but if it does conclude that the First Minister has misled Parliament and potentially breached the ministerial code, then that is incredibly serious."
Speaking to the BBC on Friday morning, UK Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said that the ministerial code "is clear that if the code has been breached, the individual should resign".
He added: "It's more than just about Nicola Sturgeon, it's about the integrity of the Scottish Parliament, the integrity of the office of the First Minister and standards in public life.
"The First Minister wrote the foreword to the Scottish ministerial code and she said, and these were her words: 'I will lead by example in following the letter and the spirit of this code.'
"So she set herself high standards, and now she needs to live up to those high standards."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel