The Scottish Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have been accused of "actively misleading people" over publication of a major education report.
One critic said they were engaged in a "relentless campaign" to undermine the Scottish Parliament.
It comes after MSPs were told they would get access to draft preliminary findings from a review of Curriculum for Excellence by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) but would not be able to publish, cite or quote them.
In a letter to Clare Adamson, Convener of Holyrood's Education and Skills Committee, John Swinney said the OECD had been "clear" that the "early preliminary draft of their report, which has been shared with the Scottish Government for the purposes of fact checking and clarification of contextual points only, is confidential and cannot be published".
READ MORE: John Swinney at centre of new secrecy row over education report
Mr Swinney, who is Education Secretary and Deputy First Minister, has been under growing pressure to publish the document and, last month, suffered a parliamentary defeat when opposition MSPs teamed up to back a Lib Dem motion that included a call for its release.
Notification that MSPs alone would be given confidential access to draft findings drew an angry response from Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie, who said: "This is an insult to the people of the country that they can't be trusted with a 7-page summary of preliminary recommendations.
"People will draw their own conclusions that the SNP are not prepared for their record on education to be judged at the election.
"This is a summary of fraction of a report, in a private library, under lock and key."
But correspondence shows the Scottish Government wrote to the OECD's Directorate for Education and Skills on March 9 to ask formally if it would be possible to publish the draft report following last month's education debate and vote at Holyrood.
The organisation's response states: "We are in receipt of your request for reaction on the motion by the Scottish Parliament calling for the immediate publication of the draft OECD report on the Review of CfE, which was shared with the Government on 2 February for fact checking purposes.
"At the outset, please note that disclosure of documents and other material produced or disseminated by the OECD for consideration of its Members is governed by the rules of the OECD.
"In particular, we note that the preliminary draft report regarding the Curriculum for Excellence Review 2021 is classified as confidential and not for dissemination.
"As such, the said report is protected and cannot be published and disseminated to the public.
"We trust that this information will be of use in your deliberations."
READ MORE: John Swinney urged to set out education reform timetable
Ross Greer, education spokesperson for the Scottish Greens, said: "The Tories and Lib Dems are actively misleading people as part of their relentless campaign to undermine the Scottish Parliament.
"I've published the letters showing there is no government cover-up of this report, letters they received at the same time I did.
"Greens have led criticism of the SNP's poor record on education, whether it was the exams shambles we had to fix for them, the need for teachers to access regular covid tests or the tragic lack of support for children with additional needs.
"We won't lie to the public for political gain though. Its sad that others have stooped to that level."
READ MORE: Defeat for John Swinney
The OECD review was originally scheduled for release in February.
However, it was announced in April last year that publication would be delayed until June 2021 because of the pandemic.
Scottish Conservative Shadow Education Spokesman Jamie Greene said: “Throughout this process it is clear that John Swinney has never wanted voters to be able to see the SNP’s record on education before the election in May.
“The Greens joined opposition parties last month to support Scottish Conservative demands for the release of this review yet now seem happy to defend the SNP to the hilt.
“The SNP promised parents an interim report so that parliament and the public could scrutinise its findings and take any immediate action needed to better our education system. That now seems to have disappeared too.
“The Greens are nothing short of hypocrites on this matter. In one breath demanding transparency and action and in the next lining up to save John Swinney’s skin, despite his shambolic handling of our education system.”
Lib Dem education spokesperson Beatrice Wishart MSP said: "This is very strange behaviour from Ross Greer. The government has dozens of its own spin doctors, I'm not sure why the Green party are doing their job for them.
"Scottish Liberal Democrats first asked John Swinney to commission an interim report almost a year ago. He told us at Education Committee in September that he would be 'happy to discuss' getting an interim report with the OECD. We know from a freedom of information request that John Swinney did not even bother to contact them.
“The SNP orchestrated this report coming out a month after the election, denying voters the opportunity to judge them on their record on education.
“Allowing a select number of people to receive a private viewing of a flimsy seven-page summary is inadequate. No-one with Scottish education’s interests at heart would choose to operate this way.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel