CONTROVERSIAL hate crime legislation has passed its final hurdle in Holyrood despite concerns over freedom of speech.
MSPs passed the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill by 82 votes to 32, with four abstentions.
It brings to an end one of the most heated and contentious Bill processes in the history of the Scottish Parliament.
Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf had earlier sought to allay fears following a marathon debate in Holyrood and multiple amendments.
He said those simply stating a belief – such as that an adult man cannot become a woman or that gay relationships are sinful – would not fall foul of the new law.
Critics also raised concerns that the legislation excludes women because it does not cover attacks based on a victim's sex.
The legislation creates a criminal offence of stirring up hatred against protected groups, expanding on a similar offence based on race that has been on the statute books for decades, as well as consolidating a number of different pieces of hate crime legislation.
Speaking in Holyrood, Mr Yousaf said: "To those who think they may accidentally somehow fall foul of the law... because they believe sex is immutable, or they believe an adult man cannot become a female or they campaign for the rights of Palestinians... or those that proselytise that same-sex relationships are sinful, none of these people would fall foul of the stirring up of hatred offence for solely stating their belief – even if they did so in a robust manner.
"Why? Because solely stating any belief, which I accept may be offensive to some, is not breaching the criminal threshold."
Mr Yousaf was forced to make a number of changes to the Bill during its passage through Holyrood.
He said: "The safeguards of the Bill are so, so important to recognise – and there are really strong safeguards in this Bill."
The final Bill mandates that there must be intent in the stirring up of hatred and it must pass a reasonable person's test before an offence has been committed.
Amendments brought by both Mr Yousaf and Justice Committee convener Adam Tomkins on Wednesday sought to further strengthen the Bill's protections for freedom of speech.
But Mr Tomkins's Conservative colleague Liam Kerr, the party's justice spokesman, said the legislation is still "fundamentally flawed".
He said: "The Scottish Conservatives strongly opposed the attacks on freedom of speech throughout the SNP’s Hate Crime Bill.
"Under pressure, Humza Yousaf did U-turn but he has never accepted how badly the SNP got this wrong. The Bill is still riddled with glaring flaws.
"We voted against the SNP’s Hate Crime Bill because it is a danger to freedom of speech. Criminalising what people say in their own home is too extreme.
"We agree that hate crime should be rooted out but the SNP should not have allowed a fundamental right to be trampled on in the process."
Labour MSP Neil Bibby said the Bill is needed "because hate crime has become more widespread, society has become more polarised and divided".
He said: "All of us can see how raw and unpleasant some aspects of political debate have become and how easily hate can rear its head."
Mr Bibby said it was "deeply regrettable" that the legislation would not cover attacks based on the victim's sex, saying it is "clear that women are subjected to hate because of their sex".
He said this must be addressed as soon as possible, and that Labour would follow "closely" the efforts of a working group set up by ministers to consider this.
Liberal Democrat Liam McArthur said his party would support the Bill after changes were made to the original proposals.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel