Why are new polls showing less support for independence - and a loss of trust in Nicola Sturgeon?
More than 20 consecutive polls showed more Scots wanted to leave the UK than wanted to stay.
READ MORE: Here's how support for independence has changed in five years
But that changed in the week between Alex Salmond putting the metaphorical knife into his former pupil... and Nicola Sturgeon returning the favour with her former teacher.
So here are five reasons I believe are behind that reversal of fortune - all of them to do with reputation and communication.
1. SNP unity shattered
For approaching 14 years, the Scottish National Party has run the Scottish Government.
MSPs were tightly controlled in what they said publicly - with legendary discipline.
But when Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon fell out, it was like Muhammad Ali stepping into the ring with Joe Frazier.
Two political heavyweights were set to slug it out in public.
Supporters were forced to choose whom they believed.
2. Loss of Trust in Alex Salmond
Former FM Alex Salmond won two court cases.
First proving the SNP government had bungled an inquiry into his behaviour.
Then being found not guilty of 12 charges - ranging from attempted rape to breach of the peace - with not proven on another.
His QC was recorded on a train saying his client could be seen as a “sex pest” and “bully”.
Even those who had wished to see Mr Salmond walk free were left in doubt about his character.
3. Loss of Trust in Nicola Sturgeon
Scotland’s First Minister’s approval rating soared during the pandemic with her popularity in Scotland far beyond that of PM Boris Johnson.
She demonstrated superb communication skills at daily Covid briefings – handling every question asked.
READ MORE: How does Nicola Sturgeon's evidence relate to the ministerial code? Legal expert shares analysis
A majority of Scots supported her leadership - until her former friend Alex Salmond accused her inner circle of working against him.
As Mr Salmond put it: “even to the extent of having me imprisoned”.
If coming from opposition parties, it would be a stunning allegation.
But to come from her former “best friend” and SNP legend, it took on the character of a Putin-esque plot.
4. Unconvincing marathon performance
Ms Sturgeon started brightly on the front foot at the Holyrood Salmond inquiry.
But three things indicated she was struggling at times: Firstly, some answers were taken for a walk in the park - down a side street – then up a blind alley...as she spread her words across subordinate clauses, until any clear meaning was lost.
Secondly, she repeatedly answered “I don’t know” or “ I can’t recall”...or some other variation – on at least 50 occasions.
Thirdly – she created the headline she wanted to avoid: “I had no reason to want to get Alex Salmond”
5. A new balance of power
The political see-saw has tilted again - because Mr Salmond is on one end of it and Ms Sturgeon is on the other.
So voters approaching the May 6th election will have one more choice before casting their vote.
Do they back Sturgeon or Salmond?
Already the polls are demonstrating the effects of that choice.
So what do we learn from all this?
• Organisation can speak with only one voice
• Once a reputation is damaged, it may be irreparable
• If specific allegations are laid against the leader, they must be accepted or proven wrong…or they linger
• The current leader must out-perform the greatest scrutiny – or support will wane
• Once an organisation is split, it needs to rebuild to become effective again
Bill McFarlan is co-founder and co-owner of Glasgow-based communication firm Pink Elephant Communications.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel