ALONGSIDE the maxim about people in glass houses should come a twin saying about people in palaces and how they shouldn't moan about money.
It can be desperately difficult to look at those who benefit from all the comforts a gross fortune brings and feel pity for their blighted lives.
Listening to Harry tell Oprah Winfrey how he was cut off financially by his father was pitiful - a grown man, married with a child, complaining at not being funded by his pops.
Hearing him detail how his father stopped returning his calls, however, and you feel sympathy for him.
What Meghan and Harry gain from extreme wealth, they seem to lose in emotional good health. And there we should, of course, be able to empathise.
Sunday night's interview with the couple brought juicy tidbits: some tit for tat over titles; a she said-she said spat about bridesmaid dresses; a frankly unbelievable claim that Meghan hadn't done a bit of basic due diligence Googling of her date.
All this spilled tea left a nation divided. Is this mere petulant whining from a spoiled prince and his high maintenance bride at a time when Harry's grandpa is seriously unwell?
Or was it a justified comeback from a couple sorely maligned by their family and the media?
Anyone who has had a difficult relationship with their in-laws will have either cringed to see such a public airing of grievances or been overwhelmed with envy at the ice cold taking of revenge.
All of that is mere gossip. The main takeaways from the Duke and Duchesses's interview were these two: that Meghan's life within the royal household reduced her to suicidal ideation and that the couple claims there is systemic racism at the very top of one of Britain's seminal institutions.
Britain has a princess problem. It's not new. The comparisons with Diana are self-evident and a direct line can be drawn from her mother-in-law to Meghan.
If you are quiet, careful, biddable and predictable then you will be fine. Sophie Wessex, Catherine Cambridge. If you are anything other - Diana, Fergie, Meghan - then the tabloids will come for you and, it would seem, the palace will hang you out to dry.
Given the amount of work Kate, William and Harry carried out to raise awareness of mental health issues and champion mental heath charities, it is particularly damning that one of their own was desperate yet seemingly rejected in their hour of need.
Many white people will take umbrage at the suggestion Britain is racist. It's always easier to take offence than to step back and examine one's failings and prejudices. Enough people of colour are telling this same story. We should appreciate that Meghan has given an opportunity to have a public conversation about national identity and issues of race, especially in the wake of last year's Black Lives Matter protests.
Meghan has a list of attributes antithetical to British princesses: American, biracial, divorced, an actress, maturity. Possibly Meghan's greatest crime was her American sensibility: commendable qualities such an interest in health and wellness; emotional literacy; comfort talking about race. All made her irritate outmoded British mores from the same sorts who go after Millennials for their avocado habits.
At the same time, Harry has never made any attempt to hide his utter disdain for the press. It goes beyond disdain. It is a dislike bordering on loathing. It should have been no surprise that any unfair criticism of his wife was going to have dire consequences.
There seems to be consistent confusion over why the couple left the UK and the restraints of the royal family, despite them laying it out plainly. They did not leave because they wanted privacy, they left because they wanted control of their own narrative.
Talk show appearances and TV deals are not hypocrisy, they make clear good sense and should meet with approval from any British taxpayer who doesn't want to fork out for them.
Recently, on a 20 minute slot on James Corden's US talk show, Corden took Prince Harry to a military fitness obstacle course.
Harry, ex-soldier, clearly looking after himself, could have utterly humiliated Corden who, let us be blunt, appears less concerned with the maintenance of six packs. Rather than sprinting off and leaving Corden heaving in the dust, Harry paced himself to his less able companion, encouraging him on.
He came across as naturally considerate and sweet and, importantly, in his element. In our national heart of hearts, we don't want ill for Meghan and Harry. We just want this unedifying parade of complaints to cease.
They have negotiated their own happily ever after. Goodbye and good luck to them.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel