SHE’S gone and done it. Meghan Markle has finally given us all something to really drop our jaws over – not the dark colour of her nail polish, not her hand constantly touching her pregnancy bump, not the crossing of her legs (although these were clearly heinous faux pas). No, Markle has finally come out, in that interview, and, to all extents and purposes, accused the British royal family of racism.
There can’t have been many who watched the interview who did not share Oprah Winfrey's shock when Meghan shared that a conversation had taken place between Harry and an unnamed royal where ‘concerns’ about how dark their unborn baby’s skin might be, were mentioned.
Most people’s initial thoughts were ‘how crass’, ‘how thoughtless’, ‘how idiotic’, and it’s interesting that when Harry speaks about the conversation he describes it as ‘awkward’.
READ MORE UZMA MIR: Uzma Mir: Sorry, mum, but you’re not woke
It’s only when he mentioned it to his wife, whose fractious relationship with the press began with the deplorable “Straight Outta Compton” headline, had put up with months of ridiculous, one-sided accusations from the tabloids, was half-way through a pregnancy and already feeling, as she says, lonely and suicidal that the conversation, it seems, took on a more sinister meaning for both him and Meghan.
Before Meghan, Harry had not needed to see life through her eyes or understand what she and other people of colour have to wrestle with on an almost daily basis.
Indeed, let’s not forget that it was a 20-year-old Harry that attended a ‘natives and colonial’ themed party dressed as a member of Rommel’s Africa Korps, compete with a very prominent swastika around his arm.
Harry, having lived that life, and attended those types of events had seen first hand what racism looked like, so when Meghan was treated so appallingly he recognised it for what it was, and crucially – he believed her. But others won't.
The narrative against Meghan is that she’s lying, that she hasn’t said who made the comment so it can’t be true, that the timing doesn’t stack up. The very red tops that creatively build full page articles around ‘an unnamed insider’, and ‘a source close to the family’ have the actual gall to get exercised because she and Harry chose not to name this person.
As the parent of two biracial boys I’d have conversations with family members about what the babies might look like, but even my dear in-laws who grew up in a very non-multicultural environment never asked me or their son about what ‘colour’ they might be.
They would instinctively have known that that sort of question held racial and racist undertones. In fact, now that I think about it, it was more my parents who were surprised when one baby was born brown-skinned and brown-eyed and the other white-skinned and blue-eyed courtesy of their father’s DNA and the 1.4% of my DNA that’s from the Orkney Islands and 4% from Scandinavia.
We are all multi-racial – that’s what makes this whole situation ridiculous, if it didn’t have such serious, life-changing implications for the people who are living this every day because their genetic make-up randomly dictates that they have brown or black skin.
The whole saga was sadly to be expected. The arrival of a biracial women whose grandparents had worked in a hotel for whites only, into one of the most reported upon, photographed and click-baitey families in the world required thoughtful preparation, education and support.
Everyone apparently welcomed Meghan, the press and commentators swung between outright prejudice to ‘not seeing colour’.
But the family weren’t prepared. Harry wasn’t prepared and even Meghan wasn’t prepared. She and Harry momentarily were blinded – it happens when you’re in love. You’re swept up in the exquisite joy and excitement of the possibilities of the life you might share together, so much so that you forget about the potential ugliness.
This matters because elements of what we are seeing have been, are and will be replicated in families across the country. I have many mixed race friends for whom this story resonates and who are frankly relived that Meghan has spoken her truth.
The mixed race community are the fastest growing ethnic group in the UK. We all need to learn from Harry and Meghan’s experience. Older family members with attitudes straight outta colonial times are not always being challenged by 40 or 50 year olds because they profess to being ‘colour blind’.
It sounds kinda cosy – “I don’t care what colour you are, so long as you can do the job,” “I don’t think of you as coloured, “It doesn’t happen here.”
But the result of this is that when there are racist undertones, language, headlines or weird conversations about how brown your baby might be, no-one knows what to do because they’ve been so busy being ‘colour blind’ that to challenge those views is hard.
READ MORE UZMA MIR: Glasgow University racism report: 'Prejudice was part of our lives growing up'
It means acknowledging that there are problems around race, and the only way to solve that is to be actively anti-racist. With this interview the Sussexes have made the difficult decision to lay that conversation bare, to start a discussion in the hope that other inter-racial couples can be forearmed and forewarned and, hopefully, in a better place with their families than Meghan and Harry are.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel