KATE Forbes has confirmed an extended cut to stamp duty for house-buyers in England will not be matched north of the border.
UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak used his Budget on Wednesday to announce continued relief for property purchases, but the Scottish Government’s Finance Secretary said the temporary reduction to Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (LBTT) – the equivalent of stamp duty in Scotland – would still end in March.
The Scottish Conservatives have called on Ms Forbes to “think again”, warning that the action will mean that “many families in Scotland will be unable to move home”.
READ MORE: Sunak insists Britain's 'recovery begins today' as he unveils spend now, tax later Budget
That move is despite the Chancellor saying the Scottish Government would get an additional £1.2 billion as a result of his Budget.
But Ms Forbes said part of that cash had already been accounted for – or “baked in” – to the spending plans she announced at the end of January in the Scottish budget.
As part of that, Ms Forbes said she had made the “big commitment” to extend business rates relief for a full year – adding Mr Sunak was only doing this for three months.
In Scotland, retail, hospitality, leisure and aviation businesses will pay no rates during 2021-22, Ms Forbes has pledged, saying this had been the “number one ask from business”.
But when asked if she would replicate extended reductions in stamp duty, Ms Forbes said in Scotland the changes would end, as planned, on March 31.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes on UK Budget: 'The storm clouds of austerity are on the horizon'
Asked about this on BCC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland, Ms Forbes said there were no plans to replicate the extension north of the border.
The Finance Secretary said: “We will stick to that original plan, that was set out clearly. It was intended to support the recovery of the residential property market this financial year, that has been achieved.”
She added: “The nil rate band was already lower in Scotland, and yet we have seen record high levels of transactions and house purchases, so it has achieved its purpose.
“But, ultimately, when it comes to tax policy, I have choices. The number one ask from business was to extend the 100% relief on non-domestic rates, that’s what I have done alongside freezing council tax to help households in need so those are our choices in taxation.”
Last July, the Finance Secretary announced the threshold at which buyers must start to pay LBTT would increase from £145,000 to £250,000 – a move which she said at the time would mean 80% of buyers would not pay anything under the levy.
That was announced in the wake of a similar announcement from the UK Government.
The Scottish Conservatives have called on Ms Forbes to “think again”, warning that the action will mean that “many families in Scotland will be unable to move home”.
Scottish Conservative finance spokesperson, Murdo Fraser, has warned the move could risk “stagnation” to Scotland’s housing market at a crucial time.
He said: “Homebuyers in other parts of the UK are being given a very welcome helping hand during these challenging times.
"Yet the SNP have decided not to give the same support to buyers in Scotland, despite receiving over £10billion in additional pandemic funding from the UK Government.”
Mr Fraser added: “This is a mistake, and the SNP finance secretary needs to think again. The consequences of this will be that many families in Scotland will be unable to move home.
"This also risks causing stagnation in the housing market at a time when we need to focus on reviving and rebuilding Scotland's economy.”
Anthony Conroy, regional director for Scotland at estate agency Yopa, said that the LBTT holiday has meant that “Scotland has seen record high levels of transactions and house purchases, bolstering the market and wider economy”.
He added : “The cliff-edge date of March 31 will leave many sales vulnerable to fall-throughs and will leave lots of people disappointed. Even if Forbes wasn't keen on extending the holiday until the end of June, it would have been nice to have seen some support in the form of a tapered approach.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel