A SCOTTISH council area has been dubbed the most affordable location in Britain for people trying to get on the property ladder.
Research from Nationwide Building Society has revealed the most and least affordable areas for first-time buyers, with locations in Scotland featuring in both the most and least affordable lists.
East Ayrshire in Scotland is the most affordable place, analysis has found, with Edinburgh ranking highly on the lack of affordability front.
However, it was Kensington and Chelsea in London that is the least affordable location in Britain.
Nationwide Building Society measured by the typical first-time buyer house price to earnings ratios in local areas across Britain, using Office for National Statistics (ONS) data.
In Kensington and Chelsea, the typical house price is 16.8 times earnings, the report found.
East Ayrshire, which covers a large area to the south of Glasgow, with Kilmarnock and Cumnock being its main towns, was on the other end of the spectrum, with the average first-time buyer house prices at 2.3 times typical earnings.
Andrew Harvey, senior economist at Nationwide, said: “In Wales and Scotland, the respective capital cities see strong demand for housing and have the highest house price to earnings ratios.”
Looking at the areas which have seen the biggest improvements in affordability between 2015 and 2020, Mr Harvey said Aberdeen had seen the greatest improvement in Scotland.
He said: “The London borough of Hammersmith and Fulham has seen the biggest improvement in affordability over the period, with the average first-time buyer house price to earnings ratio falling from 15.6 to 11.5.
READ MORE: Scots town named Britain's top property hotspot thanks to green spaces and culture
“This was driven by a combination of lower prices (12% lower than five years ago) and higher earnings (up 17% compared with 2015).
“In Scotland, the city of Aberdeen has seen the greatest improvement in affordability, with average first-time buyer house price to earnings ratio declining from 4.7 to 3.2 in the last five years. This is predominantly due to the 28% fall in average prices over the period, though incomes have also risen by 7%.
“In the South West, the district of Torridge in north Devon has seen its house price to earnings ratio improve from 6.2 to 5.3.
“This appears to be due to strong growth in earnings over the period, which were 32% higher compared with 2015.
“Affordability gains in other regions have been more modest. Overall, 25% of local authorities in Great Britain have seen an improvement in affordability compared with 2015.”
Here are the least affordable areas of each region or nation in Britain, followed by the average first-time buyer house price to earnings ratio, according to Nationwide:
– London, Kensington and Chelsea, 16.8
– East of England, Hertsmere, 9.6
– South East, Oxford, 9.2
– South West, Bath and North East Somerset, 8.1
– East Midlands, Rutland, 6.6
– Yorkshire, Ryedale, 6.5
– West Midlands, Redditch, 6.3
– North West, South Lakeland, 6.3
– Wales, Cardiff, 5.9
– Scotland, City of Edinburgh, 5.4
And here are the most affordable areas in each nation or region:
– Scotland, East Ayrshire, 2.3
– North West, Copeland, 2.5
– North East, County Durham, 2.7
– Wales, Merthyr Tydfil, 3.2
– West Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, 3.2
– Yorkshire and the Humber, North East Lincolnshire, 3.3
– East Midlands, Bolsover, 3.7
– East of England, Great Yarmouth, 4.5
– South West, Swindon, 5.1
– South East, Dover, 5.5
– London, Bromley, 6.7
And here are the areas which have recorded the biggest improvements in affordability in each nation or region between 2015 and 2020, with the ratio in 2015 followed by that in 2020:
– London, Hammersmith and Fulham, 15.6, 11.5
– Scotland, Aberdeen City, 4.7, 3.2
– South West, Torridge, 6.2, 5.3
– East of England, Brentwood, 5.7, 5.1
– Yorkshire, Harrogate, 6.0, 5.3
– North East, Middlesbrough, 3.5, 2.9
– West Midlands, Solihull, 5.2, 4.6
– South East, Oxford, 9.8, 9.2
– North West, Carlisle, 4.0, 3.5
– Wales, Gwynedd, 4.8, 4.4
– East Midlands, Oadby and Wigston, 5.4, 5.0
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here