ANYONE shown to have conspired against Alex Salmond should be sacked, a former SNP minister has said.
MSP Alex Neil said that if senior SNP and Government figures had been part of a concerted effort to destroy the former First Minister, they should pay with their jobs.
He said: “If it was proven there was a conspiracy – everybody involved in the conspiracy I think would be getting their jotters.”
Mr Neil said Mr Salmond believed Nicola Sturgeon and her inner circle had been “stitching him up” to prevent him making a political comeback.
READ MORE: Liam Fox - Salmond row making SNP Govt look like 'second-rate tin-pot dictatorship'
Mr Salmond has accused Ms Sturgeon's husband, the SNP chief executive Peter Murrell, and others in the party of trying to ruin him and even have him imprisoned.
Speaking on Radio 4’s Today programme, Mr Neil admitted the growing fallout between Mr Salmond and Ms Sturgeon could hurt the SNP at the Holyrood election.
He said: “I think there’s a real problem now because this is starting to dominate the airwaves at a time when we’re still dealing with the pandemic and also, in four weeks’ time, we go into the initial start of the election campaign.
“I think the SNP leadership has got to try and put a lid on this.”
The former health secretary went on: “He [Mr Salmond] believes that there was a conspiracy to get him.
“Initially he thought it was an attempt to keep him out of public life and not allow him back into the Scottish Parliament after he lost his Westminster seat.
“But I think since then this has grown and he believes a number of people have been involved in conspiring against him and stitching him up.”
READ MORE: Lord Advocate James Wolffe QC says he was out the loop on Salmond evidence censorship
Asked if Mr Salmond believed Ms Sturgeon and her circle were involved in a conspiracy to “do him down”, Mr Neil replied: “Basically, I think he does, yes.”
Mr Salmond lost his Gordon seat at the Westminster election of 2017, but a few months later children's minister Mark McDonald quit in a sleaze scandal, leading to speculation there might be a Holyrood byelection in the overlapping Aberdeen Donside seat.
Mr Neil added: “I think Alex believes after he lost his Westminster seat there was a possibility of a by-election in Scotland in his neck of the woods and he believes some people were frightened of him coming back in, which he says he had no intention of doing anyway.”
A Holyrood inquiry is looking at how the Scottish Government bungled a probe into sexual misconduct claims made against Mr Salmond in 2018.
He had the exercise set aside in a judicial review, showing it was “tainted by apparent bias”, a Government flaw that left taxpayers with a £512,000 bill for his costs.
He was later charged with sexual assault but cleared of all counts at a High Court trial last March.
He has claimed the prosecution was driven by people close to Ms Sturgeon who resented his victory in the civil case and wanted to damage him and remove from public life, "even to the extent of having me imprisoned".
READ MORE: Crown Office ordered to release evidence of Salmond 'conspiracy'
Mr Salmond claims the Crown Office is sitting on material that supports his claims in order to protect the powerful.
The inquiry yesterday agreed, despite SNP objections, to use its power to compel the production of documents to get the material at issue, which the Crown Office acquired as part of mr Salmond's criminal trial.
The inquiry has asked for all messages between Mr Murrell, SNP chief operating officer Susan Ruddick, SNP compliance officer Ian McCann, and Ms Sturgeon’s government chief of staff Liz Lloyd.
Mr Salmond is due to give evidence to MSPs tomorrow, and Ms Sturgeon is due to testify next week.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel