A CAMPAIGNER who describes cuts to care home visiting during the pandemic as a “human rights disaster” says she is confident that “meaningful contact” will resume this time.
Cathie Russell, from Glasgow, set up the Care Home Relatives Scotland Facebook group in August last year amid growing frustration among relatives over rules that she says were “worse than prison visiting”.
The group now has some 1,800 members.
The Scottish Government is set to publish guidance today which will pave the way to “safe indoor visiting” from early March, with its roadmap out of lockdown promising to “maximise meaningful contact between residents and their loved ones as the pandemic continues”.
Ms Russell, a retired council communications manager whose 89-year-old mother has been in a care home since 2019, said relatives have previously felt that care homes delayed open up even when allowed to do so amid fears of new outbreaks.
She said: “I think it will be better than last time. I feel the care homes themselves were extremely reluctant to let anyone in.
"Even when visiting could have been allowed, they were dragging things out until it wasn't.
"We did big survey when the October 12 guidance came in and only 10 per cent of people in our group got anything approaching what that guidance would have allowed.
"As soon as this new guidance comes out, we will be drawing up surveys based on that so that in a fortnight, and a month, and six weeks time, we can see how that's starting to look, and if there are care home groups emerging as not making progress."
Along with co-founders of the Facebook group, Ms Russell has been working with infection control consultants, KS Healthcare, to create a step-by-step picture guide for visitors - published on the Facebook group yesterday - on how to visit loved ones safely in their room at a care home, or to take them out for a drive.
READ MORE: NHS Lothian drops policy blamed for slowing down vaccinations in care homes
Ms Russell said: "It sets out exactly what steps you need to take to keep everything safe - what needs cleaned and so on - so that people can switch their mindset to thinking all the time about infection control, and really to build confidence with the care homes as well that residents' relatives are as enthusiastic as they are to keep everything as safe as it can be."
Since the beginning of January, 535 care home residents have died with Covid in Scotland - 23% of the total this year - but vaccination now appears to be cutting mortality substantially.
However, Ms Russell questions what would have happened without the immunisation programme, and stresses that families do not want to go backwards.
She said: "What we don't want is that as soon as there's a knew variant, or immunity from vaccination wanes quicker than expected, that suddenly we're all shut out again.
"The data on deaths and hospitalisations is really encouraging but it raises the question what would they have done without vaccinations? Were they just going to leave us out in the cold forever?
"We really believe that the route to opening care home doors all along was infection prevention and control and PPE and people doing that in a really careful and consistent way, like they have in Europe."
In France, visits to relatives in nursing homes have been allowed since April with stringent conditions, while in Germany and the Netherlands care homes have enabled residents to meet with relatives by turning garden sheds or telephone boxes in their grounds into 'visiting pods'.
Ms Russell stresses that her own mother has received "extremely good care", including up to four Skype calls a week with family, but that going forward one priority for Scotland could be the creation of a formal organisation - similar to England's Relatives and Residents Association - to represent families.
"I think there is a need for it, but obviously we would have to get constituted and elect members and so on. It is quite a lot of work."
READ MORE: Pandemic exposed 'fragile and creaking' social care system, finds review
It came as Holyrood's Health and Sport Committee heard feedback from social care experts on the recent independent review on the future of social care in Scotland, which recommended increased involvement for carers and families in the planning and delivery of services.
Cassie Hersee, manager of Isle View Nursing Home in Aultbea, in the Highlands, said some of their residents were admitted prematurely because people - especially in remote and rural areas - "don't have a choice".
She said: "It really needs to start in the home when things are starting to breakdown. A lot of the people who come here, there is no residential care in their area, so they're straight into nursing home which is a very acute kind of sector.
"But a lot of them perhaps don't need to be here as early as they are. They could have been cared for in the community, if we had those dementia specialists on the ground going in supporting families."
Annie Gunner Logan, director of the Coalition of Care and Support Providers, said Scotland had already legislated to give people more choice and control over their care through self-directed support, but this had been "patchily" implemented.
She welcomed giving relatives representation through Integrated Joint Boards, but added that "involvement has to go beyond just sitting around a table".
Ms Gunner Logan added: "Critical in all of this are the recommendations around the pivot to early intervention, because inevitably that means you're going to have to go out to communities and find out what people want, what do they understand about social care?
"Because you can't get involved in something if you don't understand what it is, and the complexities of it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel