European Commission vice-president Maros Sefcovic has accepted that mistakes were made in the process leading up the EU’s recent attempt to trigger Article 16 of the Northern Ireland Protocol.
Mr Sefcovic said the commission “deeply regrets” how it handled the issue.
The vice-president came under scrutiny while appearing before Ireland’s European Affairs Committee on Tuesday.
Mr Sefcovic was accused of “splitting hairs” and failing to engage with questions from political representatives about the EU’s decision to briefly trigger the controversial mechanism.
The EU backtracked on the move, which it said was due to efforts to restrict the export of Covid-19 vaccines out of the bloc.
Mr Sefcovic said the issue was resolved in a matter of hours.
“Article 16 was never activated and I can reassure you that the commission has learned the lesson and the commission will do its utmost to protect peace in Northern Ireland, as it has done throughout the entire Brexit process,” he added.
“I really would like to underscore the fact that Ireland and Northern Ireland was not only on our minds all the time, but also in our hearts as well, and therefore I believe we achieved very good results.”
The Northern Ireland Protocol requires regulatory and customs checks on goods moving from Great Britain to Northern Ireland.
However, the new arrangements have caused disruption since January 1.
Mr Sefcovic added: “I would like to stress that our commitment to the protocol is unwavering but we also have to understand that the implementation of the protocol is a shared responsibility.
“It must be always a two-way street.
“We also have to recognise the fact that we knew from the beginning that the United Kingdom leaving the European Union, the customs union and the single market is a massive operation, that it’s not possible to prevent all the disruption.
“We could do our best and we are working on it to minimise the negative impact on the people of Ireland and Northern Ireland.
“But it was quite obvious from the beginning that there will be teething problems and I believe that we can resolve them if we work very well together.”
He said the European Commission is setting up a “clearing house” which deals with all the issues that affect the UK and the Republic of Ireland.
Mr Sefcovic also said the EU wants to see more information from UK authorities, adding it does not have real-time access to its IT system.
However, the EU official faced criticism from a number of political representatives, who accused him of not providing clarity around the bloc’s decision.
Fianna Fail TD Dara Calleary said Northern Ireland and Ireland “wasn’t in the hearts and minds” of those in the commission on January 29.
“We would be remiss of our job if we did not pursue what happened in the days leading in to January 29 and I am concerned that you haven’t engaged with my colleagues who asked around those issues,” he added.
“You say Article 16 was never activated – unfortunately vice president with complete respect you are splitting hairs as the signal was given that it would be activated – were it not for the intervention of the Taoiseach (Micheal Martin) and (Foreign Affairs) Minister (Simon) Coveney, it probably would have been.
“The giving of the signal was enough to do the damage.”
Mr Calleary said there should be a formal mechanism involving the Irish Government and the Northern Ireland Executive when Article 16 is being discussed at official level.
Mr Sefcovic said their primary objective was to make sure that Europe was getting its fair share of vaccines.
“Really, we had the feeling that we are not always getting our fair share from the production which is made in the European Union,” he added.
“Simply, we didn’t have enough transparency of where the vaccines were going.”
Fianna Fail Senator Lisa Chambers said the EU’s mistake was “colossal” and had huge political implications for Northern Ireland and the Republic.
READ MORE: Article 16 Northern Ireland: What is Article 16 of the Northern Ireland protocol?
Ms Chambers added: “What we’re still trying to figure out, and what we’re very keen to hear from you this morning, is the events that led to you making that decision.
“Did you make that decision alone? Did you consult with your commission colleagues with the president with other commissioners, and when did you inform the other commissioners of your intention to invoke Article 16.
“That is the crucial piece of information that we require from you this morning.”
Mr Sefcovic said it was a draft proposal which was “quickly corrected”.
“It would be better not to engage in any more blame game and acknowledge a mistake was made,” he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here