‘OBSCENE’ pandemic profits, a mised miscarriage in lockdown and the promise of better days were the topics raised by columnists and contributors in the newspapers.
The Daily Mail
Ruth Sutherland said the Chancellor’s plans to tax the obscene profits made by Amazon and fellow online retailers couldn’t come soon enough.
“Ministers have stood by as the heart has been torn out of our high streets and online operators have become more bloated,” she said. “An online sales levy, coupled with reform of discredited business rates, must be part of any blueprint to save Britain’s shopping centres. Not only would it help repair battered public finances, it would give bricks-and-mortar shops a fairer crack of the whip.”
She said the sheer size of Amazon’s sales - £91bn during the first three months of last year - was breathtaking.
“The cost to consumers and society of letting Amazon and its peers become ever more rich and powerful is too high. The Chancellor has the tax levers in his hands. He should not hesitate to use them.”
The Independent
Hannah Clark was told of the loss of her baby as she lay alone in hospital last November, following a rippling pain in her abdomen.
“Under the latest Covid-19 restrictions, my partner, Gary, had been asked to wait in the corridor and while one of the nurses went to get him,” she said. “I dressed myself, put my face into my hands, and howled.”
She said the pandemic had impacted severely on expectant mothers.
“During my pregnancy, I never actually met my assigned midwife,” she said.
She turned to the online community to talk abut their shared experience of losing a baby, she said.
“The solidarity and support of strangers sharing their stories reminded me that the world was still turning, and that I was still a part of it,” she said.
“Only now I was part of a conversation about loss and survival that has existed between women since the beginning of time – and there is no need for any of us to be silent,” she said.
The Guardian
Imogen West-Knights said she was becoming irritated with the incessant doom mongering that was going on on Twitter and other social media.
“A significant number of people, including but not limited to influential voices on Twitter, have decided that there will be no “post-Covid” and that thinking we will ever return to a social life that looks like the one we left in March last year is laughable,” she said.
The hopefulness that was evident in the first lockdown was there not longer, she said, and asked why so many people were being so negative.
“Pandemics do end,” she promised.
“Whatever some people have taken to saying lately, better days are on the horizon. Joy is coming.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here