The nation needs to have a “plan B” to continue to tackle the Covid-19 pandemic says, Jeremy Hunt.
The former Health Secretary made the comments despite the successful vaccine programme which has raised hopes of reopening society.
He told BBC Breakfast: “In November and early December we weren’t thinking about this Kent variant that arose and there will be other variants.”
READ MORE: Fidelma Cook: I’m lucky. I’ve survived coronavirus. My guardian angel didn’t desert me
He pointed out that the vaccines minister had said in Parliament that there are 4,000 different mutations around the world, and it may well be that one of those is immune to the vaccines.
Mr Hunt told the programme: “We need to have a plan B that makes sure that having done all of this work with this brilliant vaccine programme, that is by far the most successful anywhere is Europe, that is not then undermined because we suddenly find ourselves subject to a new mutation that is immune to all these vaccines.”
Hunt added that a 10-year plan and sustained funding increase for the social care sector is needed because it goes hand-in-hand with the work being done in the NHS.
He told BBC Breakfast: “We need to be much better at looking after people at home so they don’t need to go into A&E.
“I think that if there is one thing that comes out of this pandemic that people would support very strongly is to say `let’s look at the incredible job done not just by the NHS frontline workers but by care workers’.”
READ MORE: Covid Scotland: NHS Western Isles owes 'huge debt' to coastguard for assistance airlifting patients
Clive Dix, chairman of the UK Vaccine Taskforce, said scientists were helping to “second guess” future mutations of coronavirus in order to create new potential vaccines.
Asked whether it was possible to produce a vaccine that was comprehensive at tackling new mutations, he told BBC Radio 4’s Today: “Yes, absolutely.
“The UK is properly at the forefront of surveying all of these variants.
“We have actually sequenced nearly 50% of all the virus that has been sequenced in this pandemic at the Sanger centre in Cambridge."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel