Flichter
By Dictionaries of the Scots Language
A persistent language myth is that Eskimo languages have 100 words for ‘snow’. In fact, the languages of the Inuit of Greenland and Canada are agglutinative: one ‘word’ can be formed from a string of what, in English, would be different words. For instance, West Greenlandic siku ‘sea-ice’ is the root for sikuaq ‘newly-formed sea-ice’, but instead of saying ‘newly-formed sea-ice’, Inuits say something equivalent to ‘newlyformedseaice’.
Now Scots seems to have a lot of words associated with ‘ice’ and ‘snow’, ranging from the rather splendid bobantilter ‘icicle’, to nip-nebs ‘Jack Frost’ and tirl ‘a flurry of snow’. Flichter ‘snowflake’, today’s word, is one such. However, close attention to the Dictionaries of the Scots Language (https://dsl.ac.uk/) reveals that something more complex – and arguably more interesting – is going on in each case. Bobantilter (‘prob. a peculiar formation from bob …, to move up and down, and tilt, v., to tip up’) seems to have originally meant a dangling ornament like an earring; nip-nebs ‘pinch-noses’ is what Jack does; and tirl seems to have earlier meant ‘twirl’ (a word to which it is related). Flichter, related to flicht ‘flight’, was in Older Scots a verb, meaning ‘flutter’. Extra meanings followed: John Jamieson, the great early nineteenth-century lexicographer, records the word as meaning ‘a great number of small objects flying in the air; as a flichter of birds, a flichter of motes, etc’. Such citations demonstrate a common phenomenon in linguistic behaviour: extension in meaning, often through metaphorical/metonymic usage. Catherine Slater’s fictional servant Marget Pow, back in 1925, referred to how ‘the flichters are a’ over the house owin’ to the peat we’re usin’: snow wasn’t involved there!
Scots Word of the Week is written by Jeremy Smith, Professor of English Philology in the University of Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel