A FORMER local authority sewerage boss who once warned that privatisation of the water industry could lead to a return to the days of the cries of “gardyloo” has received a high honour from a prestigious body.
Professor Tom Anderson, 86, a retired civil engineer and former head of Strathclyde Regional Council sewerage department, is in an elite group of people to have been a member of the Institution of Civil Engineers for 60 years.
Prof Anderson, from Coatbridge, was delighted to receive a special award for his years of membership which is also a reflection of his dedication to civil engineers and helping to bring on future generations entering the profession.
Read more: Glasgow coffee roasters Dear Green mark 10th anniversary with just the right blend
“There are not many of us who have 50 years membership, and even fewer with 60 years of membership with the institute,” Prof Anderson said. “I was one of the first recipients of this recently introduced award and the immediate Past President of the Institution, Paul Sheffield, in a letter with the award, congratulated me on reaching this significant milestone. He noted that the institution highly valued my long association with them and my enduring commitment to the engineering profession.”
The respected industry body did not accept members until they had turned 25, and Prof Anderson joined as soon so he was able to.
“I think it is fantastic institution to be part of and can open up many opportunities,” he added. Among his many career accomplishments, including water and sewerage adviser to the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, Cosla, and a director of the Scottish Greenbelt Foundation, Landtrust Co Ltd, he also went on to become an examiner and reviewer with the Institution of Civil Engineering.
Read more: Boost in farm tours and staycations is helping to build Scottish agritourism
In 1993 Prof Anderson warned politicians that the tremendous gains in health brought about by a publicly controlled sewerage service could have been put at risk if the service was privatised, an option being considered at the time in the UK.
In his inaugural lecture as a visiting professor at Paisley University, Professor Tom Anderson argued that if it was the Government's intention to ensure the public had the highest quality sewerage service at the lowest possible cost, then that was exactly what they had, with Strathclyde households paying only 12p a day.
Speaking at the time he said: ''Not so long ago, without water and sewerage services, residents resorted to throwing their excreta out of windows, the rivers were heavily polluted, a strong stench was everywhere, and, in short, the public's environment was dreadful.
''It concerns me greatly to read in recent days of these conditions returning, not so far away from us, south of the Border at Walsall. It has been reported that residents in a tower block have been disconnected from the water supply because of non-payment by one resident.
''Consequently, residents have resorted to throwing their excreta out of the windows.”
Prof Anderson added: “Privatisation wasn’t something that happened in Scotland instead a statutory body was set up and I think it was the right thing as in Glasgow, in particular, a great deal of work had taken place from the 1950s and 60s surrounding the quality of water and sewerage systems which led to improved public health.”
The grandfather, who was also a keen golfer and served on the committee of Drumpellier Golf Club, also initiated and conducted research into working practices in the UK following the death of four waste workers in the Rutherglen area. The study looked at safety equipment and procedures in place. His findings were later adopted and he was awarded the Institution of Civil Engineers/Municipal Engineers Medal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here