A prominent SNP politician calling for his party to draw up an alternative route to independence has called on colleagues to “seize the initiative” and not rule out May’s election being a “defacto referendum”.
The Scottish Government’s Constitution Secretary, Mike Russell, unveiled the SNP’s plans to hold a second referendum if Holyrood returns a pro-independence majority at May’s election.
Mr Russell set out the plans at a meeting of the SNP’s national assembly today – stressing that if a call was again ignored by Westminster, legislation would be drawn up at Holyrood for a vote to still be held, assuming Holyrood had a pro-independence majority after the election.
But Chris McEleny, who has consistnetly called on the party to draw up a Plan B , with Boris Johnson repeatedly stressing he will not cave to calls for a re-run of the 2014 referendum, has said that the SNP must set Boris Johnson a deadline of before the election to agree to a referendum so that “another mandate is not wasted “.
Mr McEleny wants the Scottish Government to set the UK Government a deadline to agree to a Section 30 order - the process to agree a referendum- of March 31.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says SNP's priority is 'legal independence referendum'
If the UK Government does not agree to a referendum, then Mr McEleny has argued it must not be ruled out that this May’s election is in itself turned into a referendum on Scottish independence, with a pro-independence majority being seen as a mandate to begin the process of Scotland leaving the United Kingdom.
Mr McEleny believes his party is not being bold enough and is still giving Boris Johnson too much opportunity to stop any campaign for independence.
He said: “It is welcome that the party has finally conceded that the strategy of relying on Boris Johnson’s permission to hold an independence referendum was not going to work.
“The Scottish Government must progress with a referendum bill now, setting Boris Johnson a deadline to agree to a section 30 order before the election. Why wait until after the election to ask his permission, again, when we already have several mandates to hold an independence referendum, and we know he will say no?”
READ MORE: Analysis: Sturgeon ups political ante with Plan B: Holyrood staging its own Indyref2
He added: “A parliamentary majority exists now that can pass a bill, so that the necessary arrangements for a referendum can be made and implemented.
“In order that the outcome of this year’s election allows the case for Scottish independence to be progressed, as opposed to another mandate being stored in the trophy cabinet at the party’s HQ, we must now seize the initiative.
“The opportunity to turn May’s election into a de-facto referendum must not be squandered, or ruled out, especially if it may be the only opportunity to test the independence question for many years to come.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel