The BBC's representation of voices in the Brexit debate was “unbalanced” according to the incoming chairman Richard Sharp.
Appearing before the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee as the Government's preferred candidate for the post of BBC chairman, Sharp said the organisation's Brexit coverage was 'unbalanced' at times.
READ MORE: Who is on BBC Question Time tonight?
The former Goldman Sachs banker said the “breadth of the coverage” was “incredibly balanced”.
He added however that he thought BBC Question Time had featured more Remainers than Brexiteers.
Appearing before the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, Mr Sharp addressed issues including impartiality and his donations to the Conservative Party.
Asked whether he was a supporter of Brexit, he replied: “I am considered to be a Brexiteer.”
He said it was not a “universally held view” that the BBC had been partial in its coverage of the Brexit referendum.
He said: “Those people in favour of Remain felt the BBC didn’t appropriately discuss the accuracy of the Brexit campaign.
“Brexiteers felt that, and there have been studies done, that the representation of Brexiteers on the news and certain programmes, for example Question Time, wasn’t balanced.
READ MORE: UK Government u-turns over compensation pledge for fishing firms
“I suffer like anybody, like each one of you, confirmation bias and the question is, ‘What is the empirical truth?’
“And there have been studies and there has been some acknowledgment that some aspects of the Brexit coverage, from time to time, was not balanced.
“But I think both sides have issues with how the BBC delivered its view.”
Asked whether he himself believed the BBC’s coverage of Brexit had been unbalanced, he said: “No, actually I don’t.
“I believe there were some occasions when the Brexit representation was unbalanced.
“So if you ask me if I think Question Time seemed to have more Remainers than Brexiteers, the answer is yes, but the breadth of the coverage I thought was incredibly balanced, in a highly toxic environment that was extremely polarised.”
Mr Sharp said he had donated approximately £400,000 to the Conservative Party in the past 20 years, plus £2,500 around the time of the last general election.
Mr Sharp, who was once Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s boss, will take over from Sir David Clementi as the BBC faces scrutiny over equal pay, diversity, free TV licences for the over-75s and competition from streaming services such as Netflix, as well as the ongoing coronavirus crisis.
Mr Sharp will earn a salary of £160,000 for three to four days’ work per week.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel