BORIS Johnson has praised campaigning footballer Marcus Rashford for highlighting the need for free school meals.
During Prime Minister's Questions, Mr Johnson said the English player had been more effective at holding the Government to account than Labour leader Keir Starmer.
Mr Starmer had criticised the offerings of food to parents of children who usually receive school meals while they are at home.
Images posted on social media saw some families receive minuscule rations of food, including carrots and potatoes, said to have cost £30.
Mr Starmer asked if the PM would be happy to allow his own children to live on the portions provided, to which Mr Johnson replied: " I don’t think anybody in this House is happy with the disgraceful images that we’ve seen of the food parcels that have been offered.
“They’re appalling, they’re an insult to the families that have received them.”
The Labour leader then cited the government's guidance on what suitable meal provision was, saying: "I’ve checked the Government guidance on free school meals, published by the Department for Education.
“I’ve got it here, it sets out example parcels for one child for five days, the Department for Education, Prime Minister, you want to be held to account – one loaf of bread, two baked potatoes, block of cheese, baked beans, three individual yoghurts, sound familiar? That’s the image you just called disgraceful.
“The only difference I can see in this list and what the Prime Minister has described as disgraceful is a tin of sweetcorn, a packet of ham and a bottle of milk.
“So, he blames others but this is on his watch. The truth is families come last under this Government, whether it’s exams, free school meals or childcare.”
Mr Johnson replied: "I’m grateful to Marcus Rashford, who highlighted the issue and is doing quite an effective job by comparison to (Sir Keir Starmer) in holding the Government to account on these issues.
“The company in question has rightly apologised and agreed to reimburse.
“It’s because we want to see our kids properly fed throughout this very difficult pandemic that we’ve massively increased the value of what we’re providing.”
Ian Blackford, the SNP Westminster Leader, raised the issue of Brexit causing problems for Scottish fishermen.
He brought up the case of a constituent, Gordon Cameron, who runs GC Shellfish and says he has lost £40,000 of produce overnight due to the administrative problems of Brexit.
Mr Blackford asked the Prime Minister where his promised "sea of opportunity" was for Scottish fishermen.
He said: "My constituent in Lochaber, a producer and exporter of shellfish, is experiencing his worst nightmare. After loading a lorry of fresh local seafood on Monday, as he’s done for 35 years, his driver faced bureaucracy and delays.
“Brexit red tape now means that £40,000 of his fresh, high quality produce is lost, unable to be sold. That £40,000 produce is income for over 100 local families in many remote and fragile communities.
“Can the Prime Minister tell my constituent where is the sea of opportunity that he and his Scottish Tories promised?”
Boris Johnson responded: “Well, we’re putting £100 million into supporting the fishing industry in Scotland and across the whole of the UK.
“It is the policy of the Scottish nationalist party not just to break up the United Kingdom under their hare-brained scheme, but also to take Scotland back into the EU and hand back control of Scottish fisheries to Brussels, thereby throwing away all those opportunities.”
Mr Blackford responded that the Prime Minister's comments were "an insult".
Mr Johnson also criticised the SNP over its stance on rejoining the EU, and added: "As far as I understand it, they’re already spending money in Scotland on IndyRef2, what they call IndyRef2, when they should be getting on, Scottish nationalists, should be getting on with fighting the pandemic, that I think is what the people of Scotland want to see."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel