AN MP has hit out at the UK Government's handling of the pandemic and its provision of food to impoverished children in a passionate speech in the Commons.
West Ham Labour MP Lyn Brown passionately praised the NHS staff working on the front line describing them as the “walking wounded” of the pandemic who had been “traumatised” for a long period of time.
She blasted the Chancellor for failing to provide support for those currently excluded from existing schemes, and asked why he “bothered to turn up” to give a statement yesterday to MPs.
In her final remarks, the energetic MP then hit out at the UK Government’s offerings to some parents of food for their children’s lunches.
Shocked parents, and campaigning footballer Marcus Rashford, have been posting images of the deliveries of food they have received as part of the UK Government’s pledge to provide support for those children who would usually qualify for free school meals while the schools are shut.
3 days of food for 1 family...
— Marcus Rashford MBE (@MarcusRashford) January 11, 2021
Just not good enough. pic.twitter.com/Y7FJEFFAma
Many images showed minuscule portions of pasta, carrots, baked beans and other staples which Westminster officials said was the equivalent of £30 worth of food. This has been roundly criticised and widely disputed, with food campaigners questioning the UK Government’s valuation.
Ms Brown said: “Why are we seeing children living in poverty still with no IT devices or broadband, and why are they being cheated out of food which the public purse paid for?
“Surely every single member has seen the paltry rations we are told thirty quid pays for. Seriously, where are they shopping?”
Earlier today the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: "We are aware of the images and clear that the contents of these food parcels are completely unacceptable.
"Food parcels should contain food that parents can use to make healthy lunches throughout the week."
The Department for Education plans to open a voucher scheme similar to that operating during the first lockdown in England, he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel