Scotland’s coronavirus detection rate is the worst of the UK nations, a report from former prime minister Gordon Brown’s think tank has claimed.
Just 32% of cases are being picked up by tests, according to Our Scottish Future.
The think tank compared daily rates for positive coronavirus tests to the Office for National Statistics’ (ONS) estimates of the total number of people who had the virus.
In the six weeks leading up to January 2, figures released by the ONS estimated a daily average of around 43,379 people in Scotland had Covid-19.
This included asymptomatic cases, based on statistical modelling of population samples.
Over the same time period, Scotland’s testing programmes picked up a rolling average of 13,650 cases.
Our Scottish Future says this means 32% of the total cases are being picked up – with the equivalent figure for England being 41% while Wales was at 70% and Northern Ireland at 81%.
Even though Scotland’s contact-tracing system is generating more contacts than those in the rest of the UK, the think tank says the low detection rate and slow turnaround time for lab tests means the whole system is having almost no effect on slowing down the virus.
Each interview in Scotland yielded an average of 4.1 contacts – compared to England’s figure of 2.4 – but Our Scottish Future said the low detection rate meant the impact of Test and Protect on the R number is less than 5%.
Our Scottish Future says “big issues” with the symptomatic testing service need to be resolved, while excess capacity should be used for testing in schools.
The report says: “Scotland is currently only using around a third of its total testing capacity, with participation depressed by low levels of convenience and poor messaging across two separate testing systems (NHS Scotland and UK Government)”.
It recommends a change in messaging to focus more on testing, which should be made more convenient through increased testing locations and provision of at-home lateral flow tests.
The paper concludes: “Comparing positive tests results to the infection rate estimated by the ONS surveillance survey implies that an average of 68% of cases since November have not been identified through testing – meaning that the vast majority of cases have not been contact-traced.
“Scotland is the worst performer in the UK on this metric.”
Bacteriologist Professor Hugh Pennington said: “It’s no wonder the virus is winning because, as this report shows, we are not seeking it out, and we are not finding it as often as we should do.”
He added: “Unless you go out to find the cases in the community, then we are working with both hands tied behind our back.
“We need proper investigation of outbreaks and I despair that this is not being done at all well.
“Until we get testing and tracing right, then the virus will continue to spread.”
A UK Government spokesman said: “The UK Government is providing Covid testing and test processing in support of NHS Scotland.
“That includes more than 30 test sites in local communities and around 20 mobile units. The UK Government’s test centres and our Glasgow Lighthouse Lab are operating efficiently.
READ MORE: Supermarket to 'ban' shoppers without face masks and say security guards will 'challenge' customers
“In addition, the UK Government has provided a million lateral flow devices to the Scottish Government.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “These comparisons are entirely inaccurate, and baselessly undermine confidence in our testing programme.
“We find – and therefore isolate – more contacts per case than the rest of the UK which means we isolate more potential cases without the need for testing.”
Professor Sheila Bird, a researcher in biostatistics at Cambridge University, commented on the report.
She told the PA news agency: “The proportion of contacts put into self-isolation is higher actually per detected case in Scotland than it is in England.”
However, she said demand for symptomatic testing in Scotland should be increased, saying the convenience of access to test sites may be an issue.
She said: “In general it’s likely to be a bit more difficult in rural communities than in cities.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel