Nicola Sturgeon said she can see “no reason” why the Scottish Parliament election due in May should not go ahead.
The First Minister said that while contingency legislation setting out alternative options for the election had been passed, other countries had been able to have elections amid the global pandemic.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Scots told to stay home or risk breaking the law
Speaking on BBC’s Good Morning Scotland programme, she said: “I see no reason at this stage why the election wouldn’t go ahead.
“I think everybody would agree it’s really important that our democratic processes continue and that elections happen.
“There have been elections in many other countries over the course of the pandemic.”
She added that it may be possible to lift the latest Covid-19 restrictions if the vaccination programme manages to push ahead of the virus in the “race” over the coming months.
She said the health service hopes to vaccinate everyone on the priority list – some 2.7 million people – by early May.
“I described it yesterday as a race: we’ve got the vaccines in one lane – we’re trying to accelerate that.
“We’ve got the virus, which has just learned to run faster, in the other lane, and we’ve got to slow it down.”
She continued: “Lockdown is about trying to slow down the virus and push rates of it back down.
READ MORE:New lockdown Scotland LIVE: Coronavirus 'stay at home' order comes into force
“Now, if we manage to do that, then hopefully we will be able to start lifting some of these restrictions while the vaccination programme is ongoing, even in that first phase of it.
“But I can’t be certain about that yet, because it’s dependent on us managing to get the levels of infection down.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel