She was an unassuming pioneer who paved the way for women to join the legal profession - but her story was almost lost to history.
Madge Easton Anderson was the first woman to become a solicitor in the UK after a change in the law allowed females to enter the profession for the first time.
However, until recently, very little was known about the University of Glasgow graduate and her determined plight to practise law.
This month marks the 100th anniversary of a Court of Session judgment allowing her to become a professional solicitor, with the decision stating that the change in the law “put her in the position of a man”.
Her story has now risen to prominence thanks to a University of Glasgow project aimed at marking the centenary of the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919.
Maria Fletcher, deputy head of the university’s school of law and co-lead on the project, said: “No one had heard of her until a few years ago. It’s interesting, and very sad, that we’re only just really discovering her achievements.
“It’s part of the invisibilisation of women that is so prevalent in history.
“But she was the first to achieve many things – the first to graduate in Glasgow, the first in Scotland to become a lawyer, the first in the UK to become a lawyer, and the first to be a partner in an all-female firm.
“She was probably a very reluctant pioneer, and probably very modest about it, but when we look back from 100 years later and view it, she’s so important.”
Born in Glasgow in 1896, Ms Anderson was educated at Melville Street Primary School before going on to Hutchesons’ Girls’ Grammar School, where she received a bursary to help with her studies.
After leaving school, she studied an arts degree at the University of Glasgow, graduating with an MA in 1916.
The following year, she began the LLB course at the university, as well as an apprenticeship with Glasgow law firm Maclay, Murray and Spens (now Dentons) after partners John Spens and David Murray decided to give her a chance in the belief that women would soon be allowed to be admitted as law agents.
They were correct, and the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act was passed in 1919.
However, the Act did not automatically mean that Ms Anderson became a solicitor – despite her qualifications.
Researcher Dr Patricia Lucie, who recently had a detailed article about Ms Anderson’s life published in a legal journal, explained that she had to petition the Court of Session to be admitted as a solicitor.
“The Act was passed in 1919, but the problem was that Madge began her apprenticeship in 1917 and the Act wasn’t retrospective,” she said. “So the question was could she be admitted as a solicitor.
“The terms of the 1873 Law Agents Act were that when you entered into an apprenticeship you had to register with the Incorporated Society of Law Agents and Madge had tried to do this when she started her apprenticeship, but she was told she couldn’t because women weren’t allowed to become solicitors. So it wasn’t her fault that she didn’t meet the requirements for the Act.
“The Court of session managed to bridge the apparent gap between the new Act and the old regulations, and found that she was qualified as an entrant into the profession.”
In his judgment of December 1920, Lord Ashmore concluded that "the Act of 1919, in this matter of admission to the legal profession, has put the petitioner in the position of a man".
However, Ms Anderson’s success did not open the floodgates for women solicitors. According to Dr Lucie, The Law Society’s figures for the whole of Scotland, showed just 38 women were admitted as law agents in the next two decades.
Ms Anderson went on to work as a ‘poor man’s lawyer’ for 10 years, providing advice to those in the Anderston community of Glasgow who would otherwise not have afforded it.
In 1937, she qualified as a solicitor in England, making her the first woman to qualify in two jurisdictions in the UK, and went on to work in partnership with two other women – Edith Annie Berthan and Beatrice Honour Davy.
This is believed to be the first law firm in the UK run entirely by women.
In 1951, she retired and moved to Perthshire where she spent the rest of her days until her death in 1982.
Her gravestone in a cemetery in the village of Bankfoot marks her achievements, stating: “A brilliant Glasgow University student and first woman solicitor in Scotland.”
Historic Environment Scotland recently approved a plaque to be installed in her honour at the University of Glasgow’s School of Law building.
The university has also been running a project to mark the anniversary of the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act. The 100 voices for 100 years project tells the tales of women who have graduated from the university’s law school – including First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.
Ms Fletcher said the anniversary provided an opportunity to reflect on progress so far, and also on what still needs to be done.
“The profession is really open to women today, the law school has more women than men, and within the profession, there are more female solicitors than male,” she said.
“However, that’s not so in the advocate profession, and certainly not so on the bench. You still see huge disparity when you start to look at progression, rather than access.
“The profession is also predominantly white and middle class. So the anniversary is a bit of an opportunity to reflect on the progress, which we should celebrate, but also to remind ourselves what there is still a huge amount of work to be done.
“We need a profession to represent society and it doesn’t. The anniversary gives us the chance to highlight that really starkly.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here