MICHAEL Gove has rejected angry claims from Britain’s fishermen that they will be worse off as a result of the post-Brexit trade deal struck with the EU.
Fishermen’s leaders have accused Boris Johnson of “betraying” the industry over the compromise struck with Brussels over future fishing rights in UK waters.
However, the Cabinet Office Minister insisted they would get a greater share of the fish in UK waters and that could increase over time.
“It is fair to say that we are in a stronger position than we were in the EU and in the common fisheries policy,” Mr Gove told the BBC’s Radio 4 Today programme.
“In the common fisheries policy we were only able to access about 50% of the fish in our waters. It is the case that we are now getting a significant uptick in that number, so we will have by 2026 about two-thirds of the fish in our waters.
“This staged process gives us a chance to increase the size of the fleet, to invest in our coastal communities, and, of course, in due course we will have that opportunity to increase that quota even further.”
However, Andrew Locker, who chairs the National Federation of Fishermen’s Organisations, said the sector would be “absolutely worse off” as a result of the deal.
“I am angry, disappointed and betrayed,” declared Mr Locker. “Boris Johnson promised us the rights to all the fish that swim in our exclusive economic zone and we have got a fraction of that.”
He went on: “We are absolutely worse off. When we were within the EU, we used to trade fish with the EU. We used to swap things we didn’t use with fish that they didn’t use and that enabled us to put together an annual fishing plan.
“What we have got now is a fraction of that we were promised through Brexit. We are going to really, really struggle this year.”
Mr Locker added: “When Boris Johnson and his Government promised Brexit to the fishermen he promised none of us would be worse off. There is a considerable number of fishermen – small families, small communities – absolutely worse off by this deal.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel