The chair of an inquiry into design flaws at two of the country’s major new hospitals has urged anyone affected by the issues to get in touch.
Lord Brodie, chair of the Scottish Hospitals Inquiry, has already met with representatives of affected patients and families, but is keen to hear from more people to find out what went wrong and how it impacted on patients.
The independent inquiry, which was launched in August, is investigating the construction of the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital campus (QEUH) in Glasgow and the Royal Hospital for Children and Young People and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (RHCYP/DCN) in Edinburgh.
In a video appeal Lord Brodie said that his “priority” is for “further engagement with families and those who have been affected to listen to what they have to say”.
The inquiry will determine how issues relating to adequacy of ventilation, water contamination and other matters impacted on patient safety and care, and whether these issues could have been prevented.
It will also examine the impacts of these issues on patients and their families and whether the buildings provide a suitable environment for the delivery of safe, effective care. It will make recommendations to ensure any past mistakes are not repeated in future NHS infrastructure projects.
Lord Brodie added: “We have reached out to a wide range of those who are interested in the work of the inquiry and met with a number of those including representatives of patients and their families at both hospitals, and gained very helpful insights from these conversations.
“We have begun to gather and familiarise ourselves with relevant documentation, including material provided as a result of my earlier appeal for anyone with information to get in touch.
“Together, these insights and documentation have informed the process of identifying the specific lines of investigation which the inquiry will pursue.”
Lord Brodie’s video update also describes the progress made since the launch in August and lays out priorities for the coming year. Recent developments include the recruitment of researchers, information and document managers, solicitors and counsel.
Lord Brodie said: “As the year draws to a close, I am pleased with the progress made so far. The Inquiries Act 2005 requires an inquiry to be set up from scratch meaning lots of groundwork must be done in the first instance.
“We have been doing this while contending with the changing circumstances and restrictions arising from Covid-19.
“Despite this, we have recruited a strong team to further engage with families and affected parties, building on the work of the past few months.
“I issued a call to those applying for core participant status earlier this year to do so before December 31, 2020 and the deadline for consideration isn’t far off.
“Irrespective of core participant status, we encourage anyone who has any information pertaining to the Terms of Reference of the inquiry to please come forward and share this with us Our Terms of Reference and contact details can be found on the website.”
The inquiry was ordered by the Scottish Government following the deaths of three patients linked to bird droppings and the water supply at the QEUH in 2018 and 2019.
Kimberly Darroch, the mother of 10-year-old Milly Main who died in the QEUH in 2017 after contracting an infection, has launched legal action against NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde as she blames contaminated water in the £842 million hospital for her death.
An independent review found no sound evidence that avoidable deaths have resulted from failures in the design, build, commissioning or maintenance of the QEUH and Royal Hospital for Children (RHC) in Glasgow.
The probe, which is expected to take several years, will also look into flaws in the design of the ventilation system of the new Sick Kids Hospital in the capital which is not yet open.
The Scottish Government stepped in to stop the children’s hospital opening just a day before it was due to open.
The website includes contact details and further information on the Terms of Reference an is available at www.hospitalsinquiry.scot.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here