Nicola Sturgeon has insisted that the UK Government is "forcing" Scotland in the "wrong direction" with Brexit.
The First Minister, speaking as the deal on the future relationship between the UK and the European Union (EU) was published, complained that promises made to the country’s fishing sector had been “broken”.
READ MORE: Scrutiny of new 'special relationship' begins as trade document published
She also insisted it was “extraordinary” that Prime Minister Boris Johnson had decided to “inflict a hard Brexit” on the UK in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic and resulting recession.
Ms Sturgeon spoke out on the issue after the Scottish Government warned the agreement reached by the Prime Minister could cost Scotland £9 billion by 2030.
However, Scottish Secretary Alister Jack insisted the UK Government had struck a “fantastic deal”, as he added that coastal communities would be able to “thrive outside the EU’s unfair Common Fisheries Policy”.
His comments came after analysis by the Scottish Government indicated GDP could be reduced by about 6.1%, compared to staying in the EU.
But with Scotland having voted to stay in the EU in the 2016 referendum, Ms Sturgeon has stressed that Brexit is happening “against the wishes of most people in Scotland” and said it would “hit jobs and living standards at the worst possible time”.
Writing in The Times newspaper, she said: “An extension to the present arrangements with the EU was on offer earlier this year but the UK Government refused it.
“And while no deal would have been worse, Mr Johnson’s deal spells short-term disruption and long-term barriers.”
The Scottish First Minister claimed that as a result of the new arrangements “our people will be less safe and they will lose their right to work, study and live elsewhere in Europe”.
She continued: “We are to be taken out of the EU’s single market. Promises made to our fishing communities have been broken.”
Ms Sturgeon insisted that leaving the EU was “yet another example of Tory governments forcing Scotland in the wrong direction”.
However, she said that if an independent Scotland was able to rejoin the trading block, it could be a “bridge-builder between the UK and the EU”.
The Scottish Government also fears that lamb and beef exports will be hard hit by the extra costs of exporting to the EU after December – when the current transition period ends.
Meanwhile businesses trying to access EU markets will face additional bureaucracy and costs, with the Scottish seafood sector requiring new certificates and changes to business practices to continue to export to the EU.
On the key Scottish fishing industry, the Scottish Government fears the fleet north of the border will only see a fraction of the additional quota promised.
Another concern raised by Scottish ministers is that justice and security co-operation could be seriously impacted.
But Mr Jack insisted that after “a long and tough negotiation” with the EU, the UK had “secured a fantastic deal”.
Writing in The Times he said: “This is great news for Scottish businesses and families.
“Having delivered a deal for the whole of the UK in record time, there are opportunities ahead. It is the first time the EU has ever agreed a zero-tariff, zero-quota deal, giving Scotland’s businesses exceptional access to the EU.”
The UK Government minister continued: “Our agreement will ensure that our coastal communities will thrive outside the EU’s unfair Common Fisheries Policy.
“We will invest in our fishing communities and restore the fleet so our fishermen can catch more fish. The Scottish fish processing sector will benefit from tariff-free access to EU markets.
“Products from Scotch whisky to Orkney cheddar will be protected in the EU. And the deal meets the UK’s commitment to high standards, reflecting the importance that we place on being a leader in quality and standards.”
He added: “This is a historic moment for all of the UK. It’s time for us to come together and make the most of the new opportunities.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel