WITH less than a week to go until the big day, it's fair to say that the UK's carefully orchestrated festive bubble plans are unravelling faster than a chocolate orange on Christmas morning.
The message from politicians might be best summed up by Matt Lucas' spoof Boris Johnson: "Meet up - don't meet up."
No sooner had the plan for a five-day easing been signed off by the four governments than the situation went drastically downhill, first with Wales, then England, and now Northern Ireland getting set to plunge straight back into lockdown as soon as the turkey leftovers are cleared away.
Scotland finds itself in a better position than most of the UK, but even here cases are rising again overall and there are already hints of a post-Christmas crackdown with a review of Covid levels due on Tuesday couched as a key "decision-making moment" by Deputy First Minister John Swinney.
It is to our benefit that we were the last of the four nations to exit our version of lockdown, with the lifting of Level 4 restrictions in parts of the country only a week ago, but that just gives us more breathing space.
READ MORE: If only 'taking back control' had also applied to our borders in a pandemic
The problem., as public health experts warned from the outset, is that the virus never went away and was certainly not going to take a few days off for Christmas.
But having drawn up the UK's Christmas Covid break - partly from a fear that the public would flout a ban anyway - politicians have tied their own hands.
Rather than ruling out household get togethers, they are backtracking: in Scotland, families are urged to spend no more than one day together instead of the the original allowance of five, to avoid staying overnight, and frankly to "think very carefully" about whether it's worth the risk at all.
In Wales, the household limit has shrunk from up to three to a maximum of two - although a third household can join the bubble if they are a person who lives alone.
England's chief medical officer, Professor Chris Whitty, logically appealed to the public to consider how close mass vaccination could be, potentially clearing a path to much safer reunions with loved ones by Spring.
“We are tantalisingly close to the stage where anybody who gets into trouble as a result of this Christmas will be protected in the very near future,” he said.
“It is very important people think about that.”
In the US, the healthcare system is continuing to pick up the pieces three weeks after Thanksgiving, with new hospital admissions rising to record heights for a 19th day in a row on Thursday.
Across New York state, the number of people in hospital with Covid reached 6,147 - a number last seen in mid-May - while in California there were a record 14,283 infected patients in hospital.
In Scotland, the picture is uneven.
The Greater Glasgow and Clyde region is still feeling the impact of Level 4 restrictions, with the average number of new infections down 37% in the two weeks to Wednesday December 16, compared to a slower decline of 28% over the two previous weeks.
Right now, the region is reporting around 173 cases a day on average compared to a peak of 475 a day in the seven days to October 26.
The position in Glasgow city has stabilised exactly at the same time that the situation in Edinburgh and Aberdeen has begun to spiral upwards.
Since December 1, the prevalence of the virus in Glasgow has gone from 152 cases per 100,000 to 147 per 100,000 by December 14, although the test positivity rate still remains stubbornly high at 6.4% - an indicator that things are not entirely under control.
READ MORE: What Scotland should learn from the disastrous unravelling of Wales' firebreak 'success'
Over the same period, the virus rate in Edinburgh - which has been in Tier 3 since the system was enacted on November 2 - has nearly doubled from 64 to 110 cases per 100,000, while in Aberdeen - which started out on Level 2 but was escalated in Level 3 yesterday - the prevalence of coronavirus has surged from 62 to 140 cases per 100,000.
The good news is that, for now, hospital admissions for Covid are continuing to fall in Scotland (they roughly halved between October 26 and December 13) but that won't last.
After a long year of coronavirus, it should not have come as a surprise to anyone that cases would rebound as soon as restrictions are lifted.
We spent four months, from mid-March to mid-July, living under household visiting bans, hospitality closures, working from home, staying in our council areas, and limiting social interaction to outdoor spaces and Zoom calls.
In the process, we came close to eliminating the virus in Scotland. That was the moment to reap lasting rewards from lockdown: if we had been strict about quarantining people after foreign travel, if we had tested more and contact traced faster, if people could have been induced or enabled to be more compliant with requirements to self-isolate (in some countries, where compliance is high, people get automatic daily payments). We failed.
In New Zealand, Christmas can go ahead as normal - as long as anyone flying in from overseas to visit relatives spends their first 14 days in one of the country's government-overseen isolation hotels. They will only be allowed to leave after testing negative twice, on days three and 12 of their stay.
READ MORE: Transparency is the key to getting ahead of the anti-vaxxers
Meanwhile in the UK, with a vaccine on the horizon and public patience flagging, a return to a truly long-term lockdown like we experienced in wave one is not on the cards.
But that also means that the prevalence of the virus is never going to be driven so low that normal life can resume before the oldest and most vulnerable in population have been inoculated.
Mass testing might help detect more cases, but it can only really be effective if people trust the tests' accuracy enough to self-isolate. And if compliance is poor with PCR tests, what are the prospects with lateral flow?
As Prof Whitty notes, vaccination is near, and thank goodness.
So have yourselves a merry little Christmas. At least there are still chocolate oranges.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel