A SENIOR SNP member has called those using the debate around gender recognition reforms for their own political gain “morally repugnant”.
In a leaked report, seen by The Herald, the party’s former national secretary also said “importing culture wars from elsewhere” would “jeopardise” the independence movement.
Angus Macleod, who was the national secretary until this month, was responding to questions from members at the last SNP conference about disciplinary policy and the complaints process when he made the remarks.
He also said he would support the party adopting a “working definition” of transphobia in a “modernised” code of conduct for the party.
READ MORE: Michael Gove calls on SNP Government to outline how it has spent Brexit money
Responding to a question about why “concerns raised about transphobia have not been addressed” within the SNP, Mr Macleod said those using the Gender Recognition Act (GRA) reform debate to improve their standing should be wary.
The Gender Recognition Act and the debate around its reforms have split the SNP, with some people believing it provides an opportunity for sexual predators to identify as women to gain access to women-only spaces.
Others say critics are stigmatising transgender people and stoking up transphobia.
The reforms are aimed to make it easier for transgender people to declare their gender through self-identification, rather than go through lengthy medical screening and mental health assessments which some people find humiliating and stressful.
The UK Government has already dropped its plans to reform the law, while the Scottish Government is expected to announce its plans following the Holyrood elections in May.
Mr Macleod said: “Whilst some individuals may consider GRA reform a useful wedge issue to generate attention and, presumably, votes for themselves, doing this at the expense of a minority community is morally repugnant.
“Importing discourse from culture wars elsewhere will leave the party open to threats from disinformation and jeopardise our ability to succeed as a movement in reaching our goal of independence.”
He warned: “If people think they are succeeding in dividing our movement on this piece of legislation, they’ll try to do the same with other issues as well, in order to prevent us reaching our goal – further harming other minorities in the process. I would urge members not to fall for this approach.
“There has been some discussion at NEC [National Executive Commitee] about transphobia and there has been a clearly expressed view that there is no place for it in the party. There is a place for views on legislation to be given in a respectful way, and accepting views in good faith would be a helpful starting point.”
READ MORE: SNP hate crime legislation clears first Holyrood vote
When asked if there should be a clearer definition of transphobia within the party’s disciplinary codes, he said: “I would agree that would be helpful.
"Although the code of conduct remains quite broad brush to ensure it covers as many behaviours as possible, we currently engage specialist advice from minority communities when it comes to certain types of prejudice and xenophobia.
“We could look to formalise this, alongside a working definition for transphobia. That would allow a code to remain relatively broad, whilst ensuring more clear definitions were applied in any relevant circumstance.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel