NICOLA Sturgeon has accused Ruth Davidson of swapping her principles for a place in the House of Lords after she quietly dropped her threat to resign over Brexit and Northern Ireland.
The First Minister took a swipe at the Tory group leader, who is due to become a peer after she leaves Holyrood at May’s election, after the pair clashed at FMQs.
Ms Davidson peppered Ms Sturgeon with questions about her husband’s controversial evidence to the Holyrood inquiry into the Alex Salmond affair.
Later, Ms Sturgeon reminded her opponent of a letter she wrote to then Tory Prime Minister Theresa May in October 2018 with then Scottish Secretary David Mundell.
READ MORE: Don't call me Baroness: Davidson 'furious' over BBC description
The then Scottish Tory leader and Mr Mundell suggested they could resign if Brexit led to a differentiated settlement for Northern Ireland, undermining the Union.
They wrote: “Having fought just four years ago to keep our country together, the integrity of our United Kingdom remains the single most important issue for us in these negotiations.
'Any deal that delivers a differentiated settlement for Northern Ireland beyond the differences that already exist on all Ireland basis (eg agriculture), or can be brought under the provisions of the Belfast Agreement, would undermine the integrity of our UK internal market and this United Kingdom.
"We could not support any deal that creates a border of any kind in the Irish Sea and undermines the Union or leads to Northern Ireland having a different relationship with the EU than the rest of the UK, beyond what currently exists."
This week, the UK Government agreed a deal with the EU on the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland which would see the latter subject to a unique regime within the UK.
Ms Sturgeon said: “I will quote exactly what Ruth Davidson said.
“She said that she ‘could not support any deal that ... leads to Northern Ireland having a different relationship with the EU than the rest of the UK, beyond what currently exists.’ “Apparently, that ‘would undermine the integrity of our UK internal market and this United Kingdom.’
“I can only speculate that it is amazing what the offer of a seat in the House of Lords can do to change somebody’s opinion.”
A Tory source said it would be hard for Ms Davidson to resign as leader as she'd already done so in 2019, when she cited differences with Boris Johnson over Brexit.
Earlier, in response to Green MSP Patrick Harvie raising concerns over Brexit disrupting the supply of medicines between the EU and UK after this year, Ms Sturgeon said she was deeply worried about the last-ditch trade talks floundering and the prospect of no deal.
She said: “I am deeply and increasingly concerned about the lack of clarity over the arrangements that will apply at the end of the Brexit transition period, in only a matter of weeks.
“We are exactly a year on from the general election, when the Prime Minister said that his deal was ‘oven-ready’. Now, here we are, not knowing whether there will even be a deal.
“If there is a deal, it will be the bare bones and a minimalist one, and it will do real damage to the Scottish economy and society. I am deeply concerned about that.”
She said plans were in place food a six-week stockpile of medicines, medical devices and clinical consumables, as well as a steady supply of Covid vaccine after January 1.
READ MORE: Brexit: UK citizens could be banned from EU travel from New Year
Mr Harvie said afterwards that Brexit and Covid-19 would be a “perfect storm” for the NHS in January, traditionally the busiest time of the year for the health service.
He said: “Brexit is being imposed on Scotland against our will, but it is incumbent on the First Minister to ensure that our NHS can cope. We need urgent assurances that access to vital drugs and PPE will not be inhibited by this reckless Tory decision making.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel