Neil Oliver has said that he believes Scotland choosing independence would be a “step backwards” and would ‘infringe’ on his human rights.
Speaking to Unlocked the Coast presenter said: "For me to draw a new hard-line separating Scotland from England in that formal sense is a backwards step. I prefer what I've always had and I bridle at the thought that someone can take away my nationality and replace it with another.
READ MORE: Tom Gordon: SNP indiscipline is a symptom of dangerous over-confidence
"I push that to a point as something that infringes on my human rights.
"I'm a British citizen, that's how I see myself.
"Not in an argumentative way, I don't see that I should have to cede my right to understand myself as I am to some politician."
His comments come following a host of polls showing growing popularity for Scottish independence, with the latest being an Ipsos MORI poll for STV which found 56% backed Scottish independence.
Oliver, the former president of the National Trust for Scotland, has made his thoughts on Scottish independence known, describing the uncertainty caused by the prospect of a second referendum as a “cancerous presence."
READ MORE: Row sparked after Neil Oliver suggests Boris Johnson 'didn't feel safe in Scotland'
He also suggested that Boris Johnson did not feel safe during his visit to Scotland this year saying: "Scotland was the most welcoming country in the world. That a British PM – or indeed anyone at all – might feel unsafe here is more mortifying and heartbreaking than I can say."
The survey found 55 percent back the SNP in the constituency vote for next year's election and 47 percent in the regional list vote.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel