NICOLA Sturgeon's husband is to appear before the Holyrood inquiry into the Alex Salmond affair next week.
Peter Murrell, the chief executive of the SNP, will give oral evidence to MSPs on Tuesday, an agenda released this evening by the Scottish Parliament has confirmed.
Tuesday will be the tenth witness session of the inquiry, which is looking at how the Scottish Government botched a probe into sexual misconduct claims levelled against Mr Salmond in 2018.
Mr Salmond had it set aside in a judicial review, showing it had been “tainted by apparent bias” from the start, a flaw that left taxpayers with a £512,000 bill for his costs.
Mr Murrell has already given two lots of written evidence to the inquiry, the second after MSPs found his first submission unsatisfactory.
The SNP has also engaged one of Scotland's biggets law firms, Shepperd and Wedderburn, to represent it.
Mr Murrell potentially faces questions about controversial messages he sent backing police and prosecution action against the former first minister, and which he discussed in previous written evidence.
He is also likely to be asked about Mr Salmond telling Ms Sturgeon at the couple's home that he was under investigation by her officials - a disclosure Mr Murrell insists his wife never mentioned to him at the time.
He said in written evidence in August: “I knew about the meetings between Nicola and Alex Salmond at our home on 2 April and 14 July 2018 and I had the sense that something serious was being discussed.
“Nicola told me she couldn’t discuss the details.
"The nature of Nicola’s job means that when she tells me she can’t discuss something, I don’t press it.
“I was not present at these meetings and made no contribution to them.”
Mr Murrell may also to be asked to clear up confusion over the nature of that meeting, after Ms Sturgeon told MSPs it had been taken in her capacity as SNP leader, but Mr Murrell suggested she hadn't told him the content of it, despite its significance for the party he oversees, because it was a government matter.
He may also be asked about Ms Sturgeon's recent admission that she first learned of sexual misconduct claims against Mr Salmond by civil servants in March 2018, four days before Mr Salmond told her himself at her home.
Ms Sturgeon has claimed she forgot about the first time she heard the news - from Mr Salmond's former chief of staff Geoff Aberdein in her Holyrood office - as she was having a busy day at Holyrood.
Opposition parties have said they don't believe her.
Mr Murrell may also be asked about the use of SNP email accounts for ministerial business, potentially blurring the line between party and Government.
Mr Murrell's text messages are cited by Mr Salmond's supporters as evidence of a high-level plot to stop him making a political comeback and rivalling his successor.
Senior figures in the SNP have called on Mr Murrell to resign over the messages, which he sent the day after Mr Salmond was charged with sexual assault in January 2019.
They were subsequently leaked to SNP MP Kenny MacAskill, who then forwarded them to the inquiry.
The first said: "Totally agree folk should be asking the police questions… report now with the PF [procurator fiscal] on charges which leaves police twiddling their thumbs.
“So good time to be pressurising them. Would be good to know Met looking at events in London.”
The second said: "TBH [to be honest] the more fronts he is having to firefight on the better for all complainers.
“So CPS [Crown Prosecution Service] action would be a good thing.”
Mr Murrell has blamed "shock, hurt and upset" for expressing himself poorly.
He wrote in October to the inquiry: "I acknowledge that I did not express myself well but I suggest that in the context of such a criminal case, directing people to the Police was the only responsible thing to advise.”
He added: "In relation to the second message... my intended meaning was that any and all complaints should be appropriately investigated.
“The tone of it is a reflection of the shock, hurt and upset that I, and so many others in the SNP, felt that day given the events that had unfolded in court the previous day.
“As most people will appreciate, the immediacy of text messages lend themselves to informal, shorthand forms of expression but, even so, I would wish on reflection to have expressed myself more appropriately.”
Mr Murrell's appearance comes as the Scottish Government is being urged to release the legal advice on which it mounted and maintained its doomed defence of Mr Salmond's civil action.
Shortly after he won the judicial review, Mr Salmond was charged with sexual assault leading to a criminal trial in March this year at which he was acquitted on all counts.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel