A KEY aide to Nicola Sturgeon who had a secret meeting with a woman who later accused Alex Salmond of sexual misconduct is to be grilled by MSPs next week.
John Somers, the First Minister’s Principal Private Secretary, will appear for the first time before the Holyrood inquiry into the Salmond affair on Tuesday.
Ms Sturgeon’s trusted gatekeeper, Mr Somers is at the heart of one of the most mysterious episodes being examined by MSPs, and his appearance shows the inquiry circling ever closer to the First Minister.
In late 2017, Mr Somers twice met a female civil servant who would go on make a formal complaint about the former first minister a few weeks later.
At the time, the Government was drafting a new harassment policy in light of the #MeToo revelations and Mr Salmond would be its first subject.
READ MORE: Angus Robertson dragged into Alex Salmond affair inquiry
The Holyrood inquiry is looking at how the Government then botched the probe it launched on the back of that complaint and one from from another civil servant, costing the taxpayer more than £500,000.
Mr Salmond had the exercise overturned in a judicial review by showing it had been “tainted by apparent bias” from the start because the investigating officer has been in prior contact with his accusers.
His supporters claim he was the victim of a high-level plot to trash his reputation and stop him making a political comeback and rivalling his successor.
Mr Somers’s meetings were omitted from the initial timelines the Government gave the inquiry.
Mr Somers had been due to be asked about them in court as part of evidence disclosure for the judicial review, but the Government conceded and he was never questioned.
Earlier this month, deputy First Minister John Swinney revealed Mr Somers met one of Mr Salmond’s accusers, known as Ms A, on November 20 and 21, 2017.
In a letter to the inquiry, Mr Swinney said: “At the first meeting, Ms A made a disclosure to Mr Somers. No-one else was present at either meeting.”
The day after the second meeting, 22 November 2017, Ms Sturgeon confirmed she wanted the new harassment policy to apply to former as well as current ministers.
Her formal sign-off, which had existed in draft for several days, was communicated to the Government’s top official, Permanent Secretary Leslie Evans, by Mr Somers.
READ MORE: Sturgeon refuses to rule out ignoring third Holyrood defeat on Salmond legal advice
The Government insists Ms A’s disclosure to Mr Somers “was and remains confidential, and was not discussed with the First Minister” of her chief of staff.
However opposition parties say it would be extraordinary for Ms Sturgeon not to have known.
The inquiry has already said it wants Mr Somers to tell it more about the meetings with Ms A and if others were present.
It also wants to know if Mr Somers had been due to provide and discuss documents at the judicial review hearing which was called off by the Government dropping its doomed defence of Mr Salmond's civil action.
In his previous letter to the inquiry, Mr Swinney said Mr Somers did “not know the basis” on which he was asked to attend court, as Mr Salmond’s lawyers called him.
He said: “On 21 December 2018, after a search of documents Mr Somers produced (within Scottish Government) two calendar entries for the 20th and 21st November 2017 and confirmed those meetings were with Ms A.
“He produced these diary entries on the same day he was asked to perform the search; which was also the first time he was asked to perform that search.
“At the first meeting, Ms A made a disclosure to Mr Somers. No-one else was present at either meeting. Mr Somers has never met Ms B Mr Somers was not involved in the development of the procedure or the complaints handling process.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel