NICOLA Sturgeon is considering whether pubs and restaurants under level 2 and 3 restrictions could open later to serve evening meals – but has warned the measures are in place to “reduce the number of people coming together”.
In tier 3 of the Scottish Government’s Covid-19 strategy, local authority areas including Edinburgh and Fife have restrictions placed on hospitality businesses. Currently, no alcohol can be served to customers and traders can only operate from 6am until 6pm.
But businesses have appealed to the First Minister to “tweak the tiers” and shift the opening hours to let them offer a dinner service.
The Scottish Hospitality Group has suggested an extension in trading hours in tier 2 and tier 3 to 10pm, claiming there is no scientific evidence to support forcing premises to close their doors early.
The sector has stressed that by extending opening times by just a few hours, it means businesses can operate a full dinner service and bring in enough money to cover fixed costs such as rent, furlough contributions, and staff pension payments.
Nic Wood, director of the Signature Pub Group, added: “The more viable we can be then the less of a burden we will be on the country and we will still provide safe places for people to socialise.
“The Scottish Government must sit up and listen to what industry is saying to them or the majority of hospitality businesses, particularly the small, independent operators without deep pockets, will not be here past Christmas.
"Just tweaking the guidance slightly will save thousands of jobs and save the taxpayer millions while still giving the public a safe place to meet friends and family.”
Labour MSP for Edinburgh Southern, Daniel Johnson, has appealed to the Scottish Government to think over the plea – and has written to Ms Sturgeon on behalf of Edinburgh businesses, asking for a re-think.
He said: “Those business owners collectively run more than 100 premises across the city, and they estimate that, in total, almost 700 jobs have already been lost, with no changes for level 3.
“They fear that 500 more will be lost with the continuation of the restrictions.”
Mr Johnson said reducing the hours from 6am until 6pm to 12pm until 9pm “would enable two evening meal services”.
He added: “That small change could prevent half of the projected job losses.
“We all understand the need for restrictions, but the First Minister must surely agree that we must also review them to balance the economic cost of the public health measures.”
The First Minster said she will “consider” the proposal.
She added: “I work on the basis that if people who are being affected by this pandemic and the restrictions put forwarded proposals about how the impact could be lessened or made less difficult, we have a duty to consider that.
“We won’t always be able to agree with these proposals.”
Ms Sturgeon warned that in general terms, the needs of businesses and the requirement to stop people mixing don’t always align.
She said: “Sometimes what businesses propose are different ways of the hours that are restricted, which allow them to have more people though their businesses.
“From the businesses’ perspective, that is entirely understandable. But from the public health perspective, the reason for the restriction is to reduce the number of people coming together.
“Sometimes it may not be consistent with the public health objective and that’s why we have to make a careful assessment and come to a balanced view.”
The First Minister added: “If a restaurant is saying ‘instead of making us close at 6pm, let us open later and close a couple hours later as well’, from a business perspective, I get that because it allows a dinner service.
“But if it means that actually, a lot more people are going to be coming together, it might not be possible from a public health perspective.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel