Despite thousands of people backing calls to prevent the extinction of several native species, an attempt by the Scottish Greens to declare a "nature emergency" at Holyrood has failed.
MSPs instead backed an amendment to deal with “climate change and biodiversity loss on a twin-crises basis”.
Earlier, the party’s environment spokesman Mark Ruskell submitted a motion noting the “catastrophic collapse” in Scotland’s natural environment.
As well as a “nature emergency”, it called for 30 per cent of Scotland’s land and sea space to be dedicated to natural recovery and pushed for an end to driven grouse moor management practices as well as large-scale peat extraction.
But Environment Secretary Roseanna Cunningham said the motion was “overburdened” and suggested it was “designed to fail”.
MSPs instead supported by 85 to 35 Ms Cunningham’s amendment which called for “the continued treatment of climate change and biodiversity loss on a twin-crises basis”.
Speaking in the Scottish Parliament, Mr Ruskell said legislation was needed to prevent many of Scotland’s native species from going extinct.
He said: “This is a crisis that demands the same level of attention and action as the climate emergency. And the first step is to declare it for what it truly is, the nature emergency.”
He said he was “disappointed” that the Government had chosen to delete the word “emergency” from his motion.
Ms Cunningham said: “Scotland’s natural environment is our greatest natural asset. It provides the foundation our society and economy depends upon and improves our physical and mental health. It is also crucial to Scotland’s businesses, brands and reputation.
However she described the Green motion as “somewhat overburdened” and added: “I have to say a cynical person might just feel it is designed to fail.”
Her colleague in the SNP, Mairi Gougeon, said: “We do disagree with elements of the motion, where it pre-empts decisions that we’re yet to announce as a Government.
“However there are a number of pieces of work under way. I don’t think anyone here is in any doubt about the crisis, or the urgency, with which this needs to be tackled.”
Liz Smith, speaking for the Scottish Conservatives, said her party opposed the Greens’ policy on ending driven grouse shooting.
She said there was a “growing minority” of people ignoring the countryside code, adding that the issue was “not just about improving biodiversity, but ensuring everyone understands that”.
Claudia Beamish, speaking for Scottish Labour, said her party had “long stated that we face a nature emergency”.
Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur said he supported calls for licensing of grouse moor management, which would ensure “all practices are sustainable and compatible with the declarations of the climate and nature emergency”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel