TO chardonnay or not to chardonnay, that is the question Shakespeare should have asked. Actually chardonnay is in my humble opinion the key to the wine world. If your taste buds can't unlock the king of grapes then all hope is lost, folks.
Now, normally, I'd just be raving about the ones aged in oak with perhaps a side nod to the others but all that’s changed during lockdown. I was bored and in my boredom, I went back to chardonnay in all its different forms and thoroughly enjoyed myself.
Chardonnay’s spiritual home is Burgundy in France where it produces everything from bone suckingly dry chablis to great big fat buttery Montrachets, which I love but need to sell a kidney to buy. The fat buttery wines are the heavily oaked versions but you can take oak ageing all the way down to a few months of kissing the wood to finish the wine off. Other than chablis, whose soil helps make rather unique chalky wines, most of the other end of the chardonnay spectrum – unoaked – comes from the new world.
The Aussies lead the way for unoaked chardonnay with light aromatic wines with heaps of tropical fruits on the palate but the rest of the world are producing plenty of corkers now. Strangely the only chardonnays I've tasted recently that I really didn't like were from the South of France and Chile.
The former are disappointing across the board with wishy washy fruit and often a strange waxy palate that's better suited to riesling. For some reason, the Chilean chardonnays just give me a headache. I've no problem with the taste and overall quality but I'm a wimp when it comes to the old bonce pain.
Herencia Trabajo Chardonnay, Argentina
This is really good for the price. Fresh, fruity citrus flavours with crisp acidity and a clean finish. It's unoaked.
Oddbins £13
Astrolabe Province Chardonnay, New Zealand
Creamy elegant fruit and seriously sublime. Sublime
The Good Spirits Co £19
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel