Joe Biden: American Dreamer
Evan Osnos
Bloomsbury Publishing, £18.99
Evan Osnos’s neatly timed biography of Joe Biden, a collection of pieces previously published in the New Yorker, is brimming with insights into America’s new president-elect. The insights are not always flattering. “When Barack Obama, newly arrived in the Senate in 2005, heard Biden hold forth in a meeting of the Foreign Relations Committee,” Osnos writes, “he passed an aide a three-word note: ‘Shoot. Me. Now’.” Over more than three decades on Capitol Hill – “the windbag Mecca” – Biden had earned a reputation as a self-important blowhard with a “harrowing tendency” to put his foot in his mouth.
Still, a few years later, Biden found himself serving alongside Obama in the White House, where the two men formed an unusually tight personal and professional bond.
“Obama took to telling aides and audiences that naming Biden vice president was the best political decision he had made,” Osnos reports. The trials they faced together – healthcare reform, Republican obstructionism, familial loss – “had brought them closer than many expected”.
Joe Biden: American Dreamer is a richly detailed profile of the 77-year-old Democrat. Osnos – an award-winning journalist – spoke with more than 100 people in Biden’s orbit and interviewed the former senator four times between 2011 and July this year.
Throughout the book, you get the sense that Osnos is simultaneously underwhelmed by his subject, on an intellectual level, and drawn to him on an emotional one. It’s not hard to see why.
As the past 10 days have demonstrated, Biden, for all his flaws, is a seasoned political survivor; a mid-century American archetype made up of equal parts luck, grief and grit.
Much of Biden’s political – and, perhaps, latent paternal – appeal lies in his tragic backstory. In 1972, his first wife Neilia was killed in a car crash alongside the couple’s infant daughter, Naomi.
In 2015, his son Beau, a rising star inside the Democratic Party, died after a punishing battle with brain cancer.
These experiences imbued Biden with a singular political skill: the capacity to convey and evoke empathy on a mass scale.
In the run-up to the recent vote, the contrast with Donald Trump, who obsessed over his own perceived victimhood even as American Covid-19 fatalities topped 230,000, was stark. The incoming Commander-in-Chief is “unlikely to supply much of the exalted rhetoric that reaches into a nation’s soul”, Osnos writes. “But, for a people in mourning, he might offer something like solace, a language of healing.”
What Biden – for 35 years, a staunch centrist in the Senate – will actually do as president is less clear. Two months out from inauguration day, he faces a dizzying array of challenges: record unemployment rates, deepening racial divisions, the residual force of 70 million Trump voters, and a still-raging pandemic.
The coronavirus crisis may have had a radicalising effect on his politics. In the summer of 2019, Biden told a room full of donors in New York City that “nothing would fundamentally change” under his leadership.
“The truth of the matter is … I need you very badly,” he said. But by the spring of 2020, his message had shifted. “I want to be the most progressive president since FDR,” he reportedly told Bernie Sanders, his erstwhile primary opponent, in March.
One of Biden’s biggest tasks will be holding an increasingly disparate Democratic coalition together. The American left is much better organised today than it was when Obama was in power and Biden will have to contend with an influential socialist caucus in Congress, led by the likes of Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Obama thinks Biden will work with left-wing Democrats to implement far-reaching social and economic reform.
“If you look at Joe Biden’s goals and Bernie Sanders’s goals, they’re not that different, from a forty-thousand-foot level,” the ex-president tells Osnos. But this seems like an optimistic assessment. Biden has consistently opposed universal healthcare. He has no intention of “defunding” US police departments. And his sabre-rattling attacks on China indicate a hard-line foreign policy not entirely dissimilar to that of the outgoing White House incumbent.
Moreover, Biden has always relished elaborate displays of political bipartisanship. In 1984, he sponsored a Senate amendment designed to limit public spending and cap the size of the federal deficit. In 1999, he voted to repeal Glass-Steagall, a key piece of Depression-era banking regulation loathed by Wall Street and the financial sector.
After 9/11, he backed the invasion of Iraq and lavished praise on George W Bush. “At each pivotal moment, [the President] has chosen a course of moderation and deliberation,” he remarked from the Senate floor in 2002, as Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld were visibly laying the groundwork for war. “I believe he will continue to do so.”
Ultimately, for Osnos, what makes Biden unique is his ability to speak to working-class Americans and his sentimental attachment to the post-war Pennsylvania culture in which he grew up.
The hokey “Amtrak Joe” routine looks implausible from a distance. (The Biden family is thought to have made $15 million from book deals and media appearances since 2016.) But it lends Biden an air of blue-collar authenticity that other prominent Democratic politicians – the Obamas and the Clintons, in particular – lack. “For all his longevity in Washington, Biden has never quite belonged to the technocratic elite,” Osnos writes. “He is the first Democratic nominee without an Ivy League degree since Walter Mondale, in 1984.”
The overarching image Osnos projects is that of a veteran American legislator whose moment has finally, and improbably, arrived.
Biden was close to quitting politics after Beau’s death, Osnos confirms, but felt compelled to re-enter the fray due to the horrors of the Trump presidency. “The circumstances of a life in full and a country in peril conspired to put Biden at the centre of an American reckoning,” he writes. Biden’s choices in the coming months will determine how far that reckoning has to run.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel