MORE than 70 groups are set to sign up to a campaign of action including "civil disobedience" in the fight for action over climate change.
The Glasgow Agreement is expected to be signed on Monday to coincide with the original date for COP26 climate change conference in the city, planned for November 2020.
The 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference, is now scheduled to be held in Glasgow from November 1 to 12, 2021.
The agreement commits to create national plans to achieve 50% cuts of greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.
READ MORE: Children of the revolution in protests over climate crisis
The organisisers say the organisations also commit to using "adequate tactics, such as civil disobedience, to achieve the necessary shutdowns/retrofitting of infrastructures and reconfiguration of the economy that governments and international institutions have utterly failed to deliver".
The agreement states that "political and economic non co-operation, as well as nonviolent intervention, in particular civil disobedience, are the main tools for the fulfilment of the Glasgow Agreement".
It acknowledges that "the strategy of civil disobedience has long been used, under various names, by many before us, particularly in marginalised communities and in the global South, and we would not be able to join this struggle without these historical and contemporary sacrifices, and continuous action against climate change through struggles to keep fossil fuels underground and resistance to other industrial causes of global warming"
There are more than 70 subscribing organisations worldwide from more than 30 countries and five different continents. They include from the UK, Divest Strathclyde, Global Justice Now, Our Future NOw and XR Cymru (Wales).
The agreement takes the view that the frameworks used by governments, international organisations and the whole economic system to address the climate crisis is failing in keeping global warming below 1.5 or 2°C by 2100.
Glasgow Agreement - Introduction from Glasgow Agreement on Vimeo.
According the agreement text, its purpose is to "reclaim the initiative from governments and international institutions by creating an alternative tool for action (inventory and climate agenda) and a space for strategy and coordination for the climate justice movement".
It says: "Until now the climate justice movement has had a very big focus on pressuring governments to take action on climate, or to push for stronger international agreements within the framework of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), such as the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 or the Paris Agreement in 2015. Meanwhile, emissions have continued to rise.
"Hence the Glasgow Agreement proposes that civil society proposes its own plan of action, no longer waiting for governments and international institutions to do so. We aim to use a vast array of strategies and tactics, including civil disobedience, to achieve the necessary emissions cuts to prevent a 1.5ºC temperature rise by 2100."
It says: "From its onset, developed countries and polluting corporations like the fossil fuel industry have orchestrated the repeated failure of this institutional framework.
"Instead, an illusion of climate action was created while decisive steps were delayed and greenhouse gas emissions were allowed to continue rising.
"As a result of decades of interference by these actors, weak commitments have been continually dishonoured, and thus the main institutional arrangements on climate change, namely the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, have not produced the reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions required to halt the worst impacts of climate change.
"The Paris Agreement is only a procedure, and will not be able to achieve its stated goal of preventing the worst consequences of climate change."
Three months after the signature of the Glasgow Agreement, the members are due to produce their first national inventory of main greenhouse gas emitters.
Based on that, the organisers say, they will create a climate agenda with "priorities for action on shutdown, transformation and social justice".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel